The Big Debate

Posted on 01/31/2008 at 9:04 pm by Bob Cesca

10:16PM
Here’s a post by Jane Hamsher from December on the Clinton-Lieberman partnership to censor video games.

9:57PM
If you’re disgusted by censorship and if you dig video games, read this and this. Note who Senator Clinton is working with on her censorship efforts.

9:43PM
Senator Obama wins on the censorship discussion here. Senator Clinton is all about censorship and Obama wants parents to be more active.

9:41PM
Senator Clinton’s remarks on Iraq are going to be the news out of this thing.

9:37PM
Senator Clinton just argued the GOP case for war in Iraq in trying to explain her vote.

9:31PM
Senator Obama always starts slow, then gets stronger as the night goes on. It’s always this way in the debates. He just hit a homerun on Iraq. Senator Clinton, credit where credit is due, has been relaxed and occasionally humorous.

9PM
There’s nothing entirely new yet, but I’m fascinated watching this video feed.

Meanwhile, liveblogging happening here and here.

This entry was posted in Democratic Party and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • bajasteve

    I think they both did well tonight. I know it’s popular to engage in bloodlust during an election year, but do we really want to divide our party when there’s so much at stake? I’ve seen posts where democrats – democrats! say that they’ll vote for (insert name of really awful choice) rather than cast a vote for Hillary. Do you really want four/eight more years of the GOP trampling on your rights, forcing your children to be without health coverage, sending those same children off to die in an obscenely stupid war?If you do, then fine; go ahead and vote for Bloomberg, or Nader, or some other ridiculous loser who can’t do anything other than split our vote and ensure that senile John McCain or robo-candidate Romney sits his ass down in the oval office in January 09 and proceeds to shit all over you and our country.As for me, I’d vote for a turnip before I’d vote for anyone who would aid a republican candidate.

  • lnbno13

    I think the majority of those that are saying that are only voting at all because Obama is in the race, meaning they’ll stay home if it’s not Obama, like they usually do. Hence the record numbers in the primaries and caucuses.