The Case Against Senator Clinton

Posted on 03/17/2008 at 4:54 pm by Bob Cesca

Markos, again, encapsulates what we’ve all been talking about here:

People like me have two choices — look the other way while Clinton attempts to ignite her civil war, or fight back now, before we cross that dangerous line. Honestly, it wasn’t a difficult choice. And it’s clear, looking at where the super delegates, most bloggers, and people like Olbermann are lining up, that the mainstream of the progressive movement is making the same choice.

Read the whole post here. Some key points:

Clinton isn’t just a member of the DLC, she’s in their leadership.

Clinton hasn’t just rejected a 50-state strategy, she has openly attacked it.

Clinton didn’t just vote for the Iraq war and refuse to apologize for it, she voted to give Bush the same authority on Iran.

Right, right, absolutely.

This entry was posted in Senator Barack Obama and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Sammyscooge

    Is Markos correct when he says “most bloggers”? I’ve been under the impression that a good deal of bloggers won’t make a committment.Anyone else agree?

  • ceu

    Hey, Bob….any chance you’ll be able to get away from your deadlines to hear Obama in Philly tomorrow?

  • Nanotyrannus

    “Clinton hasn’t just rejected a 50-state strategy, she has openly attacked it.”That concept alone sends the message to Democrats everywhere “When I’m your President, you’ll be on your own.” Expect no help from her campaign or her administration unless you are in a state or district “that matters.”

  • http://www.ieatgravel.com Alaska

    She sort of sounds like my Congressman Don Young. He seems to believe that you’re only his constituent if you voted for him. Apparently, I’m unrepresented in the House of Representatives.