Nope. Sorry. No frickin’ way.

Posted on 06/13/2008 at 10:52 am by Bob Cesca

There’s no way Huffington Post is more “scurrilous” than goddamn Michelle Malkin. Vanity Fair seems to forget that Malkin stalked a little boy who dared to publicly support SCHIP.

This entry was posted in Huffington Post and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://unrelatedcontent.com Travis Disaster

    I dunno, those Rachel Sklar posts are always pretty retched. Also, this is the same thing as Radar berating Keith Olbermann or Gawker making fun of war protestors…just a case of a MSM mag establishing themselves as “mainstream”.

  • jmrunning3

    Is there even a definition that would apply to Michelle Malkin beyond brain-dead?

  • Nanotyrannus

    I get the impression that to be on the list you have to be taken at least a little seriously (which begs the question “where the hell was the GAB?). She shouldn’t have been on it at all, and definitely not in the same company as Huffington Post, Daily Kos and Think Progress.Oh but how I do love The Superficial…

  • El Mystico

    Apparently both of them are more scurrilous and less newsy than the Just Jared celebrity news blog. That’s serious Talk of the Nation stuff… did you know Gwen Stefani was pregnant again? And maybe if she was running for congress, that would mean something.