Staying Home

I thought I’d share this e-mail exchange with a voter who’s thinking about staying home in November. Here’s his e-mail:

This ‘ain’t’ what I signed up for. My life is progressive politics and this shit Obama is doing is complete horse-shit.

Furthering that bile called faith based initiatives, late term abortions, evangelical ass kissing, the death penalty for any human being let alone for sick ass rapists, FISA (he’s telling me ‘fuck me’ on FISA) and now his out and out childish babblespeak on exiting Iraq (fuck a timely exit, I want out ‘now’ the body count from staying and exiting like our cloths were burning amounts to the same thing–dead is dead and fuck how you got dead). Don’t ask the generals, ask ‘them’ the people doing the dying how they’d like to exit and they’d tell you they’ll all be out by 4pm this sunday left up to them if they had to walk to the Kuwaiti border backwards.

Bob, I love your writings, my brother, I read every posting on Huff with your name on it–and think very highly of you, but I’m not going to have the murder of NOT ONE Iraqi on ‘my’ head when I stand one day before Almighty God because of Obama’s bullshit (and I’m a ‘black-black man,’ the blackest of black men who has waited his whole life for this moment).

I’ve had enough. I’ll be sitting this one out. I’ll just have some explaining to do when asked in 40 years did I vote for the first black man to be president. I’ll just say ‘no’ and if they want to know why I’ll tell them why. I’m a Liberal Democrat first — a black man second when it comes to what I believe in.

I know, he doesn’t want his presidency ‘dogged’ by Bush talk 25/8 so that’s why he’s doing the FISA shit but that’s what’s happening and there ain’t no way around that for the 44th guy in the house — it comes with being the ’44th’ president, period. He can’t have it both ways. And neither can I.

So I’ll be sitting this one out and there ain’t one fucking word you or (the equally brilliant) Tom Hayden can say that will be changing my mind. Barack Obama can go fuck himself.

And my response:

>>I’ve had enough. I’ll be sitting this one out.

That’s a real shame… We won’t have another candidate like Senator Obama for a long, long time, especially if he loses. In addition, I think it’s important to give the man a chance to actually BE president first. If he governs to the center, then we can pick him apart for it. But meanwhile, this election is too important to put a few statements in the heat of a campaign above the greater history of this moment in time. John Kerry was pro-death penalty, anti-late-term-abortion, pro-faith-based, and he voted for the invasion of Iraq (as did John Edwards). As for Iraq, Senator Obama is our best shot at getting out. Staying home won’t absolve any of us from the atrocities of Iraq. However, voting for the best shot at getting out will certainly help.

I’m sure you know that candidates of both parties run to the center during a campaign. Senator Obama needs indepedent voters in order to secure the overwhelming mandate he’ll require in order to govern ‘his way’. While I disagree with some of his remarks, I’ll concede that he knows way more than you and I about how to win an election — after all, he beat the unbeatable Clintons.

Anyway, let’s get him elected, then hold him accountable… because the alternative is more death. McCain wants you to stay home. He’s counting on it.

Agree or disagree with Senator Obama’s recent statements, I will admit that he has to do something soon to smooth things over with voters like this e-mailer.

This entry was posted in Senator Barack Obama and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Last Call

    Bob, I agreea: the biggest mistake the left consistently makes is a failure to recognize the value of incremental change. We always want all or nothing, and we get huffy when a candidate only represents part of our vision for a more just world. I’m always hearing things from my fellow lefties about there not being “any difference” between the parties, so they don’t plan to vote. Maybe there isn’t as much difference as some of us would like, but there are differences, and even incremental change can improve the lives of a lot of people. Maybe we don’t get our way on FISA, but we might get a better energy policy or some movement on health care. The real choice we have to make is this: if we withdraw support, nothing gets any better for anyone, and we’re basically complicit in that stagnation. Let’s not forget what Howard Zinn taught us about being neutral on a moving train: doing nothing is exactly the same thing as accepting the direction things are going.

  • http://dansolomon.com dansolomon

    I’ve been having an ongoing argument for the past month or so with a good friend who’s voting Nader. I think a key to electoral politics is that candidates are accountable to their voters, not to the people who tell them fuck off. If this guy leaves the Obama camp, then he no longer gets any voice. Whereas if he stays- like the huge numbers on the mybo.com site in the FISA group- then at least we’re heard and addressed as a constituency group. I can accept that a candidate won’t share my every view, but as long as he’s aware of them and addresses me like a grown-up when going the other way, I can live with it. But you don’t get that opportunity when you write someone off.Further, if Obama really were this guy’s (or mine, for that matter, or yours) liberal dream-date, he’d be hamstrung by Congress the minute he was sworn in. We don’t get to have a genuinely progressive President until we have a genuinely progressive legislature. Otherwise, it’s just an executive constantly at-odds with Congress, and there’s no point to that. It’s why every far-out candidate, from Ron Paul to Kucinich to Barr to Nader, is a waste of a vote. Even if they won, they wouldn’t win.–d

  • AlaskanCelt

    Obama is breaking my heart with his position on FISA. That being said: “Sitting this one out” because one doesn’t like all of Obama’s positions is self-defeating, and is the progressive voter’s equivalent of holding your breath until you turn blue and pass out.Realistically, all you’re accomplishing by staying home on election day is giving John McCain an uncontested vote.If Obama loses, I hope the “stay at homes” and Nader voters are happy with McBush.

  • FrictionSoul

    I agree to your comments and to the 2 posts above, but let me ad this about voting that you three and the emailer seem to miss.If you’re going to vote for Obama and then consider your involvement complete, please fuck off and die already becauseOkay, that’s harsh.If voting for Obama is the extent of your involvement then you’re going to be very disappointed. mybo.com is not going away. Obama will need each and every one of us to right this ship. You’ve got to get involved with your local, state and federal legislatures.Expecting a vote to change it won’t change a single damn thing. See Nancy “Off The Table” Pelosi. WHat if people followed up their vote with action and kept the heat on her. I actually sent letters to Sen. Allard saying to vote his conscious – not politics – when impeachment comes up. But being a registered Dem he blew me off. I expected as much. I have much better representation with Rep. Perlmutter. And Sen. “Sellout” Salazar? Holy fucking boot-licking christ! Two faced lizard if there ever was one.Anyhow, we face a choice after Obama is elected: we vote and consider it done, or we grow up and start participating locally by drowning out the voices of lobbyists. The GOP is scared, and they’re actually counting on people having the attitudes that the emailer has and that is: just vote and don’t get involved. Leave that to the patriachial “Father Knows Best” types.

  • http://dansolomon.com dansolomon

    Well put, guy above me. That’s the flip side to “we have to have a genuinely progressive legislature before we can have a President who governs from the left”- it ain’t just gonna show up because we asked for it. We haven’t done the work to give a truly progressive President a chance- that doesn’t mean “take what you get and like it”, it means do the damn work.–d

  • http://obamaproject.windonwater.net QueenTiye

    I’m not a progressive. A AM an African American woman. I agree with most of Senator Obama’s positions. I am a huge fan of Bob Cesca. And I always smile at Bob’s over-the-topness. It’s fun, and sometimes sexy even. LOL! BUT… it is also highly refreshing (in that breath-of-fresh-air way) to know that “over the top” Bob has more good sense than some of the nutty folk who call themselves progressive but act like 5 year olds.Next “progressive” who wants to stomp off and carry all their toys with them should first get Pew Research or someone like that to find out how many “true progresives” there are nationwide, and then figure out if there are enough of them to elect the president they want (and if so, why the heck haven’t they done it yet?)Seriously. I’m not a progressive, but I’d be interested in seeing America have a true-blue progressive president of the kind that the progressives seem to want… Go for it!In the meantime, I pause to ironically note the definition of the word “progressive”"1 a: of, relating to, or characterized by progress2: of, relating to, or characterized by progression3: moving forward or onward : advancing”Selectively quoted from Merriam Websters online: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/progressiveQT

  • midad

    Amen FS and DS. I know I am ready to participate.

  • AlaskanCelt

    FrictionSoul:My comment was just an attempt to underscore the idiocy of “I’ll sit this one out.”I’m not sure how you decided that I consider my involvement “complete” with merely voting (nor why I should defend myself to you, but I will anyway).I have been involved in grass roots politics at the local, state, and national levels for over 40 years. I volunteer both my time and money to Democratic candidates (Obama included), and, like you, I am disappointed and pissed off at the lack of conviction and intestinal fortitude displayed by Nancy Pelosi and company.There’s no reason to get righteously indignant all over my ass.

  • bajasteve

    I posted something in another thread that I think bears repeating (because, for one thing, I’m a brilliant analyst and poster). I was around and active during the 60′s. We were all enthusiastic about changing things immediately. Guess what? It didn’t happen – surprised?Nothing worth having comes to us instantly (I know, cliche, but true), and we can’t just go vote for Obama and then pat ourselves on the back with self-satisfaction and go throw our wonderful selves a party to celebrate how wonderful we are. Any change we accomplish in this country and this government is going to take lots of work and lots of time. If you’re too lazy to commit for the long haul, please get the fuck out of the way so those of us who are willing can get on with it.And don’t tell me about your integrity and that it compels you to vote for Nader, or not vote at all. News flash – that just means you voted for McSlime – good work, moron.

  • peonyharp

    I am seconding what QueenTiye wrote about Bob Cesca, from sexy to over-the-topness – your humor and insight keep me coming back here, Bob.As to the e-mail’s author I see it very simply: if you don’t vote, you’ve given up.My first choice for president was Dennis Kucinich because he most closely represented my views and consistently backed up his words with action. To this day, even if he’s the lone voice, even if he’s scoffed at, undercut, threatened (including death threats, yes), he doesn’t back down. He persists.As someone above me wrote, the change must be incremental, but the change must come from ALL of us if we are to fix the incredible amount of trouble we’ve gotten into as Americans and as global citizens.I suggest to the voter who emailed and to anyone else who wants to see change in this country, pick up a shovel and pitch in — we’ve got a lot of BS to clear out of our government.

  • MollyBrown

    Many who have ascended the presidency have sunk under the weight of the office (GWB) or have had the office raise them to levels of greatness (FDR). Some is dependent on the times, but a lot is dependent on whether or not the populace spurs them on to greatness. For FDR, the times and the support of the people both helped; for Obama it can be similar…he’ll need the American people to tell him when he’s right AND when he’s wrong. We’ve allowed ourselves to be a passive voice in this country for far too long.