Thanks, But Nooo Thanks

If you’re an animal lover, here’s another reason to seriously question Sarah Palin’s judgment. (WARNING: Disturbing images of hunting.)

Rachel Maddow mentioned this in passing the other night, but I thought she was joking.

h/t Digby

This entry was posted in Sarah Palin and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • jane

    This got a post on Sadly, No! today. Via comments, I watched a more in-depth (10 minutes?) video here about this practice and local efforts to stop it (even though there’s a federal aerial hunting ban, Alaska has found or made a loophole and voters had to re-ban the practice every two years). Between the video linked and the comments at Sadly, I think almost every angle of both the practice and this ad were addressed. (Even hunters despise this “thrill kill” shite, there actually are Republican animal-rights supporters, etc.) Not to mention the Palinesque $150 for a wolf’s forearm part- how much for Sarah’s forearm?

  • lovetheblue

    Jane, I’ll see your $150 and raise you $1,500.Despicable. They’ve had this on HuffPo – why it’s not a MSM story is beyond me.Oops, my bad. It’s that fucking liberal media.

  • The Space Cowboy

    Good Bill Moyers show this evening…Here’s the linky-dink for the 2nd segment which I found to be a little more intersting than the first (your opinion may vary, of course).http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/09122008/profile2.html