Clarke Blows Up the Legacy Project

This is a beautiful piece of take-down by Richard Clarke. I usually don’t like to quote large chunks of a column, but this is worth it:

Bush stopped terrorist attacks? Yes, some of the many alleged plots cited by the White House probably would have matured into attacks had not the U.S. intelligence community acted. Many were more aspirational than operational, and others were the pure inventions of FBI informants. [...]

But even if taken on its face as true, should having stopped terrorist attacks earn this President a Harry Truman-like reassessment down the road? I can attest from firsthand knowledge that the Clinton administration stopped numerous terrorist operations that would have resulted in American deaths. Yet I don’t hear Bill Clinton running around boasting about that. [...]

If you don’t think the Clinton administration stopped a major terrorist attack in New York City, you might want to talk with the blind sheik, who was involved in a plot to blow up the United Nations, the Lincoln and Holland tunnels, the George Washington Bridge and a federal building housing the FBI. But that would be tough to do because Omar Abdel-Rahman is in solitary in a federal prison in Colorado.

It’s also worth noting that all of the terrorists behind the first WTC bombing were captured and convicted. Bin Laden, on the other hand, is still at large. And this:

There wasn’t a second 9/11? That’s obviously true, but it misses the point. First, we must remember that Al Qaeda terrorists are patient, deliberate planners who often wait years between strikes. Second, there was the first 9/11 – and it happened on Bush’s watch. Without rehashing the entire 9/11 Commission Report, the historical record is pretty clear by now that Bush did virtually nothing about the repeated warnings to him that those cataclysmic attacks were coming. Unfortunately, I can personally attest to that as well.

This all leads back around to the No Attacks Mythology (see my book). There weren’t any other 9/11-style attacks on American soil since 9/11, but there weren’t any other WTC bombings during Clinton’s administration either. That’s a fact. February 26, 1993 through Janurary 20, 2001. No additional WTC-style attacks by Islamic terrorists. And that’s without illegal invasions, torturing, renditions, eavesdropping on American citizens, and on and on.

This entry was posted in Bush Legacy Project and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://www.broadwaycarl.blogspot.com Broadway Carl

    Bob, I must say that your last few lines kind of scare me. Clinton takes office January, 1993 – WTC bombing February 1993. Bush takes office January, 2001 – 9/11, 2001. Obama takes office January 20, 2009…

    No wonder Biden said Obama would be tested within his first six months in office. My cynical side is thinking about the ‘I told you so’s coming from all directions should something tragic happen. My human side is hoping we’ve got our shit together after the incompetence we’ve seen for the last 8 years.

  • LameDuckHunting

    When you have to sing your own praises obviously you have very little worthy of song.Why doesn’t Bush take credit for not getting a BJ in the Oval Office? At least THAT accomplishment MIGHT have some basis in fact………..

  • SillyGit

    LDH – Your hunting of Lame Ducks appears very successful.

    My other name is cat-herder. That’s not working out so well.

    My take on Bush’s Legacy:

    The Bush administration has very successfully pissed off nearly everyone in the entire world for nearly eight years continuously.

  • gypsysoul

    did this give anyone else goosebumps?how ignorantly brazen bush and his followers are to use things such as this as his accomplishments. i can not grasp the fact that they truely believe people will forget what he has done and the books will be written in his favor!on another note…i am so intrigued in what we don’t know has happened, is happening, and might happen that it drives me crazy at times! if that secret book does exist (national treasure style) i would sacrifice a lamb to get a my hands on it! (and i am a non-meat eating animal activist)

  • LameDuckHunting

    SillyGit – Not as successful as I would have hoped, considering I began my hunt 7 years ago……

  • LameDuckHunting

    No, gypsy, no goosebumps for me…..It’s the Bushies’ SOP and I have become very sadly used to it. If you repeat the lie enough times it becomes fact.And Rove is still out there lying at will…..

  • Leeman67

    Come on Bob. Everyone knows that 9/11, which occurred “only” 8 months after Bush was in office was Clinton’s fault. And that the WTC bombing in ’93, which occurred a “full” four weeks after Clinton had taken office, was in fact…Clinton’s fault.And of course Bush has kept us “safe” since 9/11/01. Well..except for that little incident with the Anthrax letters and those random sniper shooters and such. And, of course we hadn’t been hit in such a way before that since..well..Pearl Harbor in 1941. But aside from all that, sure he kept us REAL safe. ;)

  • Lyle

    Didn’t Bush make the trains run on time?

  • foofoo

    if the system was blinking red, who didn’t see the system?

  • EL Mystico

    >>>Didn’t Bush make the trains run on time?No, but they did run a little faster when we were on Orange Alert… in case there were terrrrists chasing them!

  • sid

    The real scary comments are at the end of the article. Wow! There are still lots of bat-shit crazy people out there!