The Worst Bush Year

Check out BooMan’s year-by-year descriptions and come back to enter your vote.

Hands down, 2003 and 2005 were the worst years of the Bush administration. And if I had to choose one of those, it’d be 2003. The darkest year of the dark ride. Easily.

UPDATE: I went with 2003 over 2005 because I was thinking in terms of Bush popularity, specific actions by the administration and, looking back, 2003 seems so early — in the heart of the darkness, really.

We had the invasion and occupation of Iraq, the president’s soaring popularity augmented by his U.S.S. Lincoln flightsuit thing, followed by a violent insurgency fueled by the president’s “Bring ‘em on!” statement.

Torture at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo was underway even though we wouldn’t find out until 2004. Same with the illegal eavesdropping program. Dissent — especially against the war — was still being silenced and marginalized.

Progressive talk radio didn’t really exist in its present form and the liberal blogosphere was a fraction of its present size. The press was mostly still asleep. At least Katrina, in 2005, woke them up a little.

Speaking of Katrina… While it was an unprecedented disaster, it actually had the positive benefit of exposing the administration as the incompetent bastards the rest of us had recognized from the beginning. So while it was a terrible event, there was at least something of a positive consequence in that it may have helped to rescue the world from the Bush Republicans further expanding their power.

This entry was posted in Bush Legacy Project and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Lee Stranahan

    Katrina was just so awful in so many ways and the war was still going on, so I vote 2005. But it’s close…

  • PackyJ

    Picking a Bush year as the worst is like having to make a choice between HIV/AIDS and Stage IV lung cancer.

  • gypsysoul

    i have to agree with lee on 2005…the war combined with seeing that douche flying over new orleans with that confused “what do they want me to do” face made me have a major “f’ck him” fit!but i do miss the color-coded threat level system…that was fun

  • Lyle

    In my opinion his first year was the worst. He took the goodwill from the whole world after 9-11, that was unprecedented, and pissed it away.

  • dc_wilson

    2001 is the obvious choice because of 9/11, but I have to go with 2005: Katrina, Terry Schiavo, the Social Security scheme. That was the year the wheels finally came off the Bush regime. Sadly, it happened a year too late to make a difference. I believe that if those events had occurred in 2004, Bush would have moved to his new home in the exclusive Dallas neighborhood 4 years earlier.

  • PackyJ

    Best Bush Year – 2009.

  • Mike from Boston

    In hindsight, 2001 was the worst. The other that sticks with me was ’04, election year. War, devisiveness tearing the country apart and these jackasses walking around holding their dicks like they just stepped out of a gangster rap video.

  • http://obamaproject.windonwater.net QueenTiye

    2005 hands down. 2005 was the first year when we realized that we were knee deep in corruption AND gross incompetence – and we were stuck with the administration for 4 more years.As an African American, it was the first time I had to realize that the administration didn’t just have a different take on civil rights, but an actual active disregard for the lives of black people.2005 was the year when right to lifers became “politically correct” in the extreme with the Terry Schiavo situation.QT

  • Bob_Cesca

    The other thing about 2005 is that we actually WON the Social Security privatization debate.

  • http://willpen.wordpress.com willpen

    Other than choosing all “8″, for me it was September 11, 2001.Back in the good old days of the 80′s I worked down on Wall Street and spent many many hours working on the Commodity trading floor at the WTC.So for me that day was when American hopes and dreams died. After all these years and countless times that I have driven guests and visitors to NY, to see Ground Zero, I have yet to ever step out and personally look into that hole. I prefer to close my eyes and remember the way it was. To remember that when you walked downtown amongst the streets that tended to twist and turn, that all you needed to do was step out onto a corner and look up towards those two noble Towers so you could get your bearings and know which way to go.They can build and rebuild and rebuild but for me it will never be the same.

  • http://obamaproject.windonwater.net QueenTiye

    willpen – there’s no hole to look into anymore. Not really. Back when they first re-opened the PATH tubes, I used to ride to work that way – and I would sometimes tear up riding through the hole. Now it’s a bonafide construction site, despite the utter nuttiness going on with the building of the so-called Freedom Tower.And no – it won’t be the same, unless someone wrests control from Silverstein or whatever his name is, and lets him build actual TOWERS. But that isn’t going to happen.QT

  • jasperjava

    The absolute, heart-sinking worst moment for me was that dark night in November 2004 when I realized that the smirking arrogant ignorant doofus was actually “re-elected”. It showed beyond the shadow of a doubt that something is deeply, deeply wrong with American democracy.Katrina was awful on so many levels, but ultimately B*sh didn’t cause the disaster, as opposed to the Iraq War, which was completely preventable and unnecessary. More Americans died there than in Nawlins, and many, many, more innocent civilians were slaughtered for nothing.B*sh is responsible for more American deaths than Osama bin Laden, and more people died as a result of his warmongering than at the hands of all terrorists combined.

  • GItheJOE

    I am going to add 2000. This falls under the chicken or the egg theory. I believe that if the election wasn’t stolen we would of never had these disasters.Can any of you imagine how different this country and the world would be if the man that actually won the election was President?Got to start from the beginning.Oh wait, maybe all of these things were Clintons fault to include the broken levee in new Orleans.

  • Alan4s

    @jasperjava: “Katrina was awful on so many levels, but ultimately B*sh didn’t cause the disaster, as opposed to the Iraq War, which was completely preventable and unnecessary. More Americans died there than in Nawlins, and many, many, more innocent civilians were slaughtered for nothing.”I have to disagree somewhat. Yes, Bush didn’t cause the storm, but I think he did cause the disaster. The disasterous parts of the Katrina debacle was the utter lack of care and response by the government. Many of those who died as a result of the storm would have survived if the response had been adequate.

  • Kate

    I agree it was 2003.Terrible things happened every year Bush was in office, but 2003 was the most psychologically devastating for progressives, because we were demonized, voiceless, and coming to terms with the fact that Bush’s presidency was going to change our country irrevocably and there was nothing we could do to stop it.I think that was the year that felt the most isolating and hopeless.

  • http://www.osborneink.com Matt Osborne

    I vote for the “surge” year, 2007. The year Bush ignored every lesson of military history and reinforced failure.