Woodward Is Raping My Childhood

Posted by JumpyPants

I grew up thinking the world of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein. All the President’s Men was my favorite book (and movie) for a year or two. I wrote a long paper on the book in 8th grade, several years after Watergate, in the early days of Reagan.

But that was all a long time ago, and Bob Woodward has since made himself into a pathetic water-carrier for mass murderers like George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, writing these turgid “inside” books that are about as inside as the lint in Karl Rove’s cavernous navel; in other words, they tell you nothing you couldn’t already imagine yourself, and they’re rife with dialogue that reads as if ripped straight from The Guiding Light.

After six years of helping Bush wage an illegal, immoral war, Woodward did a half-turn toward something resembling journalistic ethics, but it was far too little and far too late, especially for all the dead and wounded Iraqis and Americans. And it’s pretty obvious he did it because he could sense the winds of popularity turning, and, well, you know, he likes to be popular. That’s really important for a good journalist, right, Bob?

And now, Woodward, in his neverending crusade to be relevant (AKA destroy what tattered shreds of ethics remain in his scarecrow skeleton), is attacking President Obama:

“This may be tantalizing but vague,” said the Washington Post scribe. “I don’t think the nanny or household tax problems and so forth are over for the Obama administration…”

Yeah. Six years of propping up Bush, and now that the President has been in office less than a week, Woodward is on the attack. And what an attack it is! Nanny and household tax problems! And so forth problems! WOW! Hold onto your hats, jobless, sick, poor Americans! There might be some nanny payments that weren’t TAXED! SHOCKING! Take that economy, environment, two wars!

Hey, Woodward, did you know that former President Bush said it was okay to do renditions on children as enemy combatants? If you think about it, that’s kind of a nanny problem, too. Will you talk about that, now, you pathetic ass?

This entry was posted in Pundit Watchdog and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Erin

    The comment of his that I found worse was the logic of “If you investigate the Bush administration’s torture tactics and prosecutions, then you are signaling to the world that the War on Terror is over, and you don’t want to do that.” Say whattttt? And, if he is going to make a vague and passive aggressive comment about the Obama administration/tax problems, why doesn’t he do some freaking reporting on it instead of making a cryptic “prediction”, with a sly smile? As someone on another board put it yesterday , the Woodward of today would not want to investigate Watergate.

  • JumpyPants

    The Woodward of today would actually want to protect the Nixon administration and write several books about them and their greatness.

  • http://www.broadwaycarl.blogspot.com Broadway Carl

    Gives a whole new meaning to “Deep Throat” doesn’t it?

  • SillyGit

    JP – He raped his integrity and buried it long ago.The Wooden Ward attacks with innuendo.Let’s hope that Obama does not smoke cigars.So Bob (W. not C.), tell me, blow jobs are impeachable but war crimes are not?Gits like this give gits a bad name.

  • http://nanotyrnns.blogspot.com/ Nanotyrannus

    Hey, Woodward, did you know that former President Bush said it was okay to do renditions on children as enemy combatants?I think I remember the Bush administrations little lawyer minions arguing that it was legal and acceptable to crush the testicles of a five year old boy in an effort to extract information from the parent. I’m not exaggerating. Torture a child to extract information from the parent.However, heaven help the godless Democrat that didn’t pay a few thousand dollars in social security taxes for a nanny…that would be just awful and preclude them from serving in any capacity in the Obama administration…

  • Lyle

    Bob Woodward: “Suppose Watergate had not been uncovered. I’d still be on the City Desk.”

  • MG

    I wrote about Woodward’s appearance on Real Time on this blog sometime during ’08. If you find it on Youtube you will see a textbook example of a sellout who is catering to a monkey. Aside from his vague, idiotic statements about the Chimp administration, he maintained that Nixon was much worse than Chimp. As I wrote at the time, I wanted to be in the studio so I could boo the hell out of him.

  • http://www.dugshop.com Paula Bonhomme

    Eh. I’ve never been a fan of Woodward. Bernstein was the real brains behind the operation. Woodward was, and still is, a good schmoozer. Schmoozing has its place, but it doesn’t make me go all gooey.