What You Don’t Know About Rush Limbaugh…

…just might kill you! Film at 11.

I just listened to about a half-hour of Rush Limbaugh stammering through his addled haze about how the recovery bill is actually a “porkulus” bill. After a lot of fake hemming and hawing about whether he should proceed, he decided to list some of the spending items in the bill. Nothing alarming or ridiculous — lots of spending on renovations to federal buildings, some green transportation provisions, and so on. All of the items he listed create jobs and save the government money in the long run.

But he and Hannity and other far-right crazy people have taken to listing these items with an outraged tone of voice that’s entirely incongruous with the content of what they’re reading. Put another way, Limbaugh could recite the names of childhood leukemia victims and, in that tone of voice, the list would sound like a roster of criminally insane rapists.

A staple of modern media satire involves taking mundane, unremarkable video footage, desaturating the colors and adding scary music to make the subject of the footage look evil or sinister — like a news magazine show or prison documentary. Only, Limbaugh isn’t doing this for satirical purposes. He’s doing it in order to deliberately deceive his dittoheaded listeners.

The far-right will never grasp or accept the fact that government spending stimulates growth — double the growth that’s created by tax cuts. I mean, the government could allocate funds to tear down the Washington Monument and, in its place, rebuild four replica monuments made out of ham, and such spending would create jobs and stimulate the economy. Likewise, modernizing the Bureau of Indian Affairs building with green technology succeeds in creating jobs, and it reduces government spending over time.

How is that so awful? Oh yeah, because Limbaugh read it aloud in a scary voice.

This entry was posted in The Media and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • https://www.coffeemakersetc.com/images/Paper_Filters.jpg Elvis the Dingeldein

    I mean, the government could allocate funds to tear down the Washington Monument and, in its place, rebuild four replica monuments made out of ham, and such spending would create jobs and stimulate the economy.

    I don’t know about anyone else, but I am so all over this plan. I want to see this in the next stimulus package. I WANT MY HAM MONUMENTS!

  • GIthePotato

    FOUR STATUES OF HAM!!!!!

  • http://www.bobcesca.com Bob Cesca

    DEDICATED TO FRO FREEDOM!

  • http://www.windonwater.net QueenTiye

    The fact that weatherizing saves money over time on energy costs to government means that the initial outlay of cash constitutes an “investment” – something the Limbaughs of the world ought to be celebrating. But maybe that’s just me.Elvis – as a poultry and fish kind of person, can I officially say “blech”? BLECH! Just the scent alone would make me ill.QT

  • http://www.windonwater.net QueenTiye

    No where to put this, so I’m dumping it here where its only marginally relevant: here’s an interesting story about some of the Washington goings on: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/11/AR2009021103203.htmlThis is an article by David Broder. I’ve read some liberal bloggers/commentators complain of “Broderism” – is this the guy for whom that is named? And – what does it mean?Anyway – the article helps articulate a little of whats been going on with the recovery and reinvestment act from the pov of washington politics.QT

  • http://www.gravesdig.blogspot.com David

    Bob,I believe that the ham monuments, while creating jobs and stimulating the economy, would technically be considered “porkulus”. The whole pig thing, y’know and therefore such as position flexible and it’s all about job creation?

  • Matt McD.

    But how does government spending help Rush? Tax cuts help him buy embargoed cigars and illegal Oxycontin and prostitutes. But all government spending does is build the prisons that he has stated druggies like him belong in.When will someone think of the morbidly obese, thrice-divorced, (self-induced) hearing impaired, impotent pill addicts?

  • Curly Lasagna

    If you really want to make those monuments appetizing to the Dittoheads you gotta make ‘em outta SPAM!

  • jane

    Spamuments.

  • trustno1

    In the right wing column, check out Beck’s new manifest “We Surround THEM” on Fox News. They’re hunkering down…

  • T

    Rush Limbaugh doesn’t just look at a situation and describe what’s on the surface. He gives it an in depth analysis, then goes on about whether he supports it or doesnt. Liberals, on the other hand, just try to stir passion and get their followers to abandon reason. Sure, Limbaugh says some far out stuff, but so does Al Gore and other liberals trying to get their point across.Everything Obama says sounds good on the surface, but things just aren’t that simple. Conservatives don’t agree with him because he’s trying to make us a more socialist country like Europe.For the record, I’m not rich, but all you people hating on the rich for wanting lower taxes are so ridiculous and that is getting so old and stupid. Most rich people are rich because their smart, and they understand that lower taxes increases incentive to go out and earn more money. Higher taxes are bad for everyone, not just the rich.

  • Brooklyn

    Finally, something Rush knows a thing or two about: pork (as in pig meat… you know, because he truly is – to quote Sen. Al Franken – a big, FAT idiot).

  • T

    By the way, that was more of a comment to one of your other articles but there was no where to respond.

  • Gretchen Wingert

    Jeeze Bob, I don’t know how you can listen to Limbaugh for half an hour, let alone 30 seconds. Your comments are as close as I can get to actually listening to him. I’m afraid my head would explode. Keep it up!!!!!

  • jane

    >>For the record, I’m not rich>>Most rich people are rich because their smartPoint taken.

  • Curly Lasagna

    >>Rush Limbaugh doesn’t just look at a situation and describe what’s on the surface. He gives it an in depth analysis, then goes on about whether he supports it or doesnt.The kind of deep analysis that would cause you to hope that the President fails? That sentiment seems kinda superficial to me, knee jerk and highly partisan. Not a position that would result from a careful consideration of the facts. I mean, I really, really disliked Bush, but it disappointed me no end that he was such a consistent, abject, embarrassing failure.

  • Curly Lasagna

    Jane, I admire your pluck…..I couldn’t do it.

  • bjritz

    Jane way to skewer the (T)roll.

  • Susan Desgrousilliers

    Maybe Rush, Hannity, and every other American hates what you moronic incompetent liberals are doing to our great nation. I am constantly amazed that you liberals continue to insist this mess we are in is all due to the Bush Administration. That is complete BS!!! Giving loans to the lower and middle class began with legislation inacted by Carter, with further enhancements by the Clinton Administration. Clinton made it mandatory for banks to make a certain amount of loans to middle and lower class families, and to help with the paperwork the banks didn’t even have to verify employment or credit worthiness. Further, Dodd, Frank, Reid and Polosi kept the congress from investigating Freddie and Fannie, who were out of control. That, you idiot is what brought us to this mess. And, your boy obama represented ACORN as their attorney to put pressure on the banks to lend to people who could never afford to purchase a home. This mess is a result of failed legislation by the liberals in the White house, senate, and congress. Maybe you should try listening to Rush and Hannity rather than make fun of them you moron, maybe you just might learn something. You and your group of idiots in Washington with this new “spending bill” are pushing us further and further towards a total depression, just like another liberal did in the thirties. The only thing this bill will stimulate is more national debt, and will help devalue the dollar, and bankrupt the nation. I would say obama is off to a great start, but given his track record I would not have expected anything else of him or his administration.

  • Likala

    Bob,You must be doing something right.We got us a real trollfest going on in the hizzy!!BTW..TrollsI don’t engage anonymous idiots on the internets other than to say…Sucks to lose doesn’t it???

  • darb

    Its a good thing people like Susan D are in the DEFINATE MINORITY in this country. You people are steadily growing smaller and smaller in number.Keep it up!!! We Democrats cannot wait for the day you are so small and insignificant that only the history books will remember you guys, as “that delusional, fear mongering group called Republicans”

  • gypsy

    minus the “conservatives” on this thread, i am convinced that each and every one of you could crack yourself up in a cardboard box! =)

  • AdyLeigh

    Gregg just withdrew his name as a nominee for Commerce Secretary.The Republicans are just so doggone committed to working with the Democrats, aren’t they?In all honesty, they’re big bullies who want to kick ALL those nasty Democrats outta their sandbox.So, the question now is, “Was that a very bipartisan thing for Mr. Gregg to do?” Right? That’ll be the question.Sadly, the question will be “Why wasn’t President Obama demonstrating a spirit of bipartisanship toward Mr. Gregg? Why does Mr. Obama hate the Republicans so much? He campaigned on bipartisanship!!! What’s WRONG with President Obama?”

  • Curly Lasagna

    >>…..are pushing us further and further towards a total depression, just like another liberal did in the thirties.Remind me, please, I’ve forgotten. Who was that liberal that PUSHED us into the Great Depression? Was it Coolidge or Hoover, I can’t recall. Thank God FDR, that conservative Republican, pulled us out……

  • J

    Say you have a crackhead cousin, and he calls you up and asks for $1000 bucks for rent. If you’re a Democrat, you write a check/get some cash, and mail/hand it to the landlord. Because while you wish your cousin would clean up and learn personal responsibility, you are more concerned that he not be homeless.If you’re a Republican, you will give your cousin the money directly because come hell or high water, he will learn to take care of himself–even if chances are VERY good he’ll buy crack. Now, there’s nothing wrong with encouraging responsible behavior. But if you strive for that above all else, you end up with abstinence-only education instead of comphrehensive sex ed, and tax cuts for businesses instead of spending and investement. Which means you end up doing very little to prevent unwanted pregnancies, STIs, and a total economic meltdown.

  • cnnStroller

    Susan, don’t waste you time here, these people are entrenched in there ideology, and can’t handle the slightest criticism. Yours, and my post will most likely be deleted by their leader, the magician of vanishing truth, Cesca.They can’t bare to consider your factual statements.Everything wrong is Bush’s fault, even though he’s spent wildly, which they’ve now adopted as their solution, after castrating him over it for years.Yes banks were penalized if they did not allow loans to unqualified low income applicants. And yes, the Democrats scuttled any and all attempts to regulate the industry by republicans, you;ve see the footage, obviously.2 informative links for those honest enough to inform themselves to the truth:http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1365/is_n4_v25/ai_15891530http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/dominic-lawson/dominic-lawson-democrat-fingerprints-are-all-over-the-financial-crisis-949653.html?startindex=60

  • http://www.broadwaycarl.blogspot.com Broadway Carl

    QT – This could be the 21st century version equivalent of Andrew Jackson’s Great Cheese Levee. The less fortnuate could eat the statues, made from the four basic food groups of course, and then there would be more jobs created by rebuilding them.

    You and your group of idiots in Washington with this new “spending bill” are pushing us further and further towards a total depression, just like another liberal did in the thirties.

    Looks like Rep. Steve Austria’s GDAB Username is Susan Desgrousilliers.Okay, once more with feeling. The stock market crash that plunged us into the Great Depression was in 1929. FDR didn’t take over until March of 1933. Look it up. It’s in all them highfalutin’ history books.This is what happens when you forego all your fancy book learnin’ and instead listen to Limbaugh and Hannity. That is why we don’t listen to them. Because they are wrong most if not all of the time.Here endeth the lesson.

  • http://www.broadwaycarl.blogspot.com Broadway Carl

    Susan, don’t waste you time here, these people are entrenched in there ideology…

    Submitted without comment except, “Oy!”

  • http://www.broadwaycarl.blogspot.com Broadway Carl

    J – I disagree with your crackhead cousin analogy.The Republican would most likely report him to the authorities and have him arrested.

  • Susan Desgrousilliers

    Carl:Looks like you need a refresher coarse in history. The Great Depression was a result of the banks crashing in 29, but FDR and his NEW DEAL was what perpetuated the depression which lasted for 10 years. Most economist have agreed that FDR did more harm than good, by doing just what your boy oboma is doing now.And DARB, don’t count us out just yet, in a few months time when the ecomony continues to tank, all the liberals who were looking to lord obama for a hand out and just realized they aren’t going to get it are going to be the ones shouting the loadest that obama doesn’t know what he is doing.

  • Curly Lasagna

    Who needs fancy book learnin’ when you got fancy pageant walkin’?……….

  • lur

    >>Most rich people are rich because their smart::Susan, don’t waste you time here, these people are entrenched in there ideology…They’re, their, there … hush, now.

  • lovetheblue

    Looks like Susan D needs a refresher “coarse” in Spelling 101.

  • Curly Lasagna

    Not to mention “hiztry.”

  • cnnStroller

    Hey lur,By the link you’ve posted, you’ve apparently joined the liberal nazi pack, spell checkers unite!They’re, their, there … hush, now.Good luck with that.Jane may join you on patrol.

  • lur

    It’s so early for this yet.Anyway, you lose again, trollest.

  • cnnStroller

    lur,You linked to a photo of a skinhead pointing to a tablet with ‘They’re going to pile their bodies over there”.How is one to interpret that? And who in the world would create such an image, and relate themselves to it, other than… a Nazi sympathizer.Address the topic raised, or move along chump.

  • http://www.windonwater.net QueenTiye

    BC – I was joining in on the fun with ham. Sorry I’m not as funny as Bob and Elvis. ;) OTOH, ***I*** hope if my cousin asks for $1000 for housing while otherwise spending money for crack, I hope I have the strength to call the darned cops. Paying for a crackhead’s expenses while they go on spending their own money for crack has a specific name – it’s called enabling, and it’s a bad thing to do.Let’s find a better analogy, can we?QT

  • lur

    Yes, cnnTroller, he’s just one amongst many of the “Nazi sympathizer” “skinheads” who work at Threadless.com. A place full of messages that are very, very open to ‘interpretation.’ So I would recommend you avoid it, at all costs.

  • seejane

    This is typical of residents of this blog when they are presented with an opposing argument. Break open the name calling book…

  • lovetheblue

    “This is typical of residents of this blog when they are presented with an opposing argument. Break open the name calling book…”You mean, as opposed to Susan D’s opening volley?”Maybe Rush, Hannity, and every other American hates what you moronic incompetent liberals are doing to our great nation.”Pot, this is Kettle. Black!!!!!!!!!!!

  • exoevolution

    Limbaugh & his ilk are political Dodo birds headed for extinction. Their time in the sun since Reagan’s “morning in America” is rapidly fading! The Bush/Cheney/Rove (error) that has been cheer leaded by the right-wing corporate water carriers has become a sunset now, clearly bankrupt of any ideas or moral fiber!A new PROGRESSIVE era is dawning bring HOPE & the promise of a just America long since deferred, that will once again represent “we the people” & NOT “we the corporations & the rich”.Here comes the sun!

  • Lee B.

    these trolls lack self-awareness:”This is typical of residents of this blog when they are presented with an opposing argument. Break open the name calling book…”Typical argument -Conservative to Liberal: “Commie Pinko!”Liberal to Conservative: “Fascist Bully!”Conservative to Liberal: “Name-caller! I win!”

  • ceu

    >>Most rich people are rich because their smart, and they understand that lower taxes increases incentive to go out and earn more money. Higher taxes are bad for everyone, not just the rich.History proves that increased taxes actually HELP a society advance. Unemployment rates go DOWN when taxes go up and go UP when taxes go down. Pretty amazing, eh?I gotta say that I don’t think that higher taxes are bad for the things taxes pay for – schools, research, infrastructure, but that’s probably just my liberal mindset…I love the idea that people are poor ’cause they’re stupid, though. (don’t deny it since you stated that rich people are rich because their [sic] smart) That one’s a winner. Wonder how many more jobs I can take on so that I can be smart, too….

  • SillyGit

    I WANT YOUR HAM MONUMENTS!Will there be green egg monuments?Also as QT and David point out, using ham for monuments has negative connotations, particularly if you build large obelisks out of ham. No one wants to get porked by that.I move that all such monuments be constructed of Tofu and Hummus.

  • ceu

    >>FDR and his NEW DEAL was what perpetuated the depression which lasted for 10 years. Most economist have agreed that FDR did more harm than good, by doing just what your boy oboma is doing now.That’s just a lie. Most economists do NOT agree with that and history shows that it’s untrue.

  • SillyGit

    Susan Desgrousilliers -

    Clinton made it mandatory for banks to make a certain amount of loans to middle and lower class families, and to help with the paperwork the banks didn’t even have to verify employment or credit worthiness.

    Everything you day is provably false. Clinton signed a law passed by a Republican congress, so Congress, led by Republicans, made it mandatory.The bit about employment verification and credit worthiness is bollocks. It’s just not true. This is fallacious twaddle fabricated by the typical caste of propaganda characters.Furthermore, all of the financial institutions have categorically denied that the bill you refer to was in any way responsible for the economic collapse. Only Rush and Sean ignore this fact.You must be on a two month delayed news feed. You do know that Obama is President now?You need to learn how to use Google and stop relying on proven liars for your news.Please come up with some new misinformation. This shit is a rerun and was thoroughly debunked some time ago.Rush Limbaugh is a big fat idiot. Also, he is a misogynist, a drug addict, and an uneducated loudmouth. Perfect role model for people that pretend to care about family values.

  • SillyGit

    Most economist have agreed that FDR did more harm than good, by doing just what your boy oboma is doing now.

    Produce a list of three URIs (proper name of URL) that point to three accredited economists and or accredited historians that ever said such a thing.You will not be able to produce such a list because NO HISTORIANS OR ECONOMISTS HAVE EVER MADE SUCH A BLATANTLY RISIBLE STATEMENT.Did you cut all history classes after romper room? You have no knowledge of American history at all. Are you from Mars? Did the liberals start the civil war?Yeah, keep calling us deluded for actually being able to see the world on our own without having to have Rush explain it all to us. You have to be delusional to think that FDR made the depression worse.I don’t believe anything without supporting evidence and you don’t have any.

  • cnnStroller

    “Rush Limbaugh is a big fat idiot. Also, he is a misogynist, a drug addict, and an uneducated loudmouth.”Hilarious.Dominic Lawson: Democrat fingerprints are all over the financial crisishttp://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/dominic-lawson/dominic-lawson-democrat-fingerprints-are-all-over-the-financial-crisis-949653.html?startindex=60

  • Lee B.

    “Most economist have agreed that FDR did more harm than good, by doing just what your boy oboma is doing now.”Only if your definition of “economist” = Wingnut Talk Show Host.

  • Kat

    >>>Rush Limbaugh doesn’t just look at a situation and describe what’s on the surface. He gives it an in depth analysis, then goes on about whether he supports it or doesnt.Hmmm…but it would seem that his “in depth analysis” doesn’t include searching for the truth. I invite you to explore the untruths.And Susan and CNN, it is difficult to view you as anything but trolls when you begin your comments with phrases such as “you moronic incompetent liberals” and “chumps.” When you come at us with negativity and hatred (not to mention bad grammar), you make it very hard to respond to you with anything else.

  • origami

    “NO HISTORIANS OR ECONOMISTS HAVE EVER MADE SUCH A BLATANTLY RISIBLE STATEMENT.”oyPoliticians caused the modern mortgage crisis through easy-lending policies (see our November 10 article), and they caused they Great Depression through a series of central controls (only some of which we’ve reviewed here). Will Americans keep getting suckered by political “solutions” to the economic problems caused by politicians? Or will we finally demand economic liberty?The Progressives count FDR a national savior and see Barack Obama as the Second Coming. Yet, while the term “progressive” evokes concern for the poor and community spirit, it names the politics of taking people’s wealth by force and controlling their lives.Progressive sophistry extends to the New Deal. For example, in a column for the New York Times, Paul Krugman writes, “Now, there’s a whole intellectual industry, mainly operating out of right-wing think tanks, devoted to propagating the idea that F.D.R. actually made the Depression worse. So it’s important to know that most of what you hear along those lines is based on deliberate misrepresentation of the facts. The New Deal brought real relief to most Americans.”Beyond the fact that left-wing academics and newspaper columnists hardly prove more reliable, a large body of scholarly work shows the destructiveness of the New Deal and earlier policies.Historians Paul Johnson and Jim Powell take a dim view of FDR, as does Amity Shlaes in her book The Forgotten Man. Shlaes is an economist at the Council on Foreign Relations. In a recent column, George Will cites other scholars critical of the policies of FDR and Hoover. Economists Richard Vedder and Lowell Gallaway criticize FDR in their book Out of Work. This book was published through the Independent Institute of California, but Krugman might address its arguments rather than smear its authors.http://www.freecolorado.com/2008/12/politicians-caused-and-worsened-great.html

  • GIthePotato

    I missed all the good trolls of day. Please come back with your Rush bullshit. As a LIBERAL, I listen to RUSH, HANNITY, OREILLY and Chickenhawk Commander Mike Gallagher to destroy neocon talking points. I welcome the insanity.

  • Packy

    Hey – if they can build Spamhenge, little thing like the Washington Monument should be child’s play.

  • veralynn

    ok Packy, that presents 2 questions1) who are these people?2) why?

  • SillyGit

    Historians Paul Johnson and Jim Powell take a dim view of FDR, as does Amity Shlaes in her book The Forgotten Man. Shlaes is an economist at the Council on Foreign Relations.

    “The Forgotten Man” has been discredited by main stream economists as a laughable treatise which uses tediously cherry-picked date to completely misrepresent the new deal economy. Not only is the book’s hypothesis ridiculous on its face, but the hypothesis is not supported by the misleading data, unless arm waving is considered evidence. Shlaes is an attorney posing as an economist. Furthermore, the “Council on Foreign Relations” is a notorious extreme right wing pseudo think tank which is best know as the source of large amounts of misinformation and outright lies that are used by neocons in propaganda efforts. It has been described as a so called ‘Think Tank’ that can create any study you need saying whatever you want so that you have something that looks an impressive scholarly effort to back up your propaganda. They are better described as a advertising agency than a think tank. The idea for the “Council on Foreign Relations” came about by replicating the pseudo ‘scientific think tanks’ set up by the tobacco industry to publish articles claiming that cigarettes were not bad for you.”Historians Paul Johnson and Jim Powell take a dim view of FDR.” And their opinion of FDR is more valuable than the opinions of the thousands of other historians who don’t take a dim view of FDR for what reason? Because they gave the result you liked? Because you hate liberals? Because your world is being fucked up by liberals?WTF is your problem exactly?COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM!Maybe that will make the mindless ideologue go away.

  • Likala

    lur,”You linked to a photo of a skinhead pointing to a tablet with ‘They’re going to pile their bodies over there.How is one to interpret that? And who in the world would create such an image, and relate themselves to it, other than… a Nazi sympathizer.”Erm…John McCain…Joe the PlumberJust sayin…

  • J

    Cops, bah! I suppose it doesn’t have to be crack. Maybe he’s just really bad with money (…because of the crack). Keep him from sleeping in an alley however you want, just make an effort to keep him out of an alley. Then, it seems to me, you’ve got a better shot at solving the root problem.

  • bibimimi

    Hugh ‘High’ Porkulous Snerdlyf*cker, Inc.