Worshipping The President

Glenn Greenwald:

It’s certainly true that one has no difficulty finding cult-like liberal veneration for Obama – those who invoke Bible-like “he’s-a-master-of-11-dimensional-chess” clichés to justify whatever he does (the Lord works in mysterious ways but even when we don’t understand what He does, we Trust that He is Supremely Good and more Wise than us and knows best); who declare, in Bush-like “with-me-or-against-me” fashion, all critics of Obama to be the Enemy; who pay homage to Kim Jong Il-like imagery such as this and this; who believe that “trust” — a sentiment appropriate for family and friends but not political leaders — should be vested in Obama and thus negate any concerns over how he exercises power.

I like and respect Glenn a lot. At the same time, I’ve also written occasionally about the imagery linked from the second “this” above. So I feel compelled to reply to Glenn’s somewhat unfair shaming of people who, for now, support the president. I think he’s missing some important factors here — major differences between Bush-worship and Obama-worship.

First, some of the God-like Obama adulation comes from segments of society that understandably and quite accurately see his presidency as the beginning of the end of centuries of oppression. No matter what our degree of progressive intellectual honesty might be, we have to acknowledge that to many Americans, President Obama is a figure who isn’t just a politician — he’s a symbol of racial and social achievement. Furthermore, fairly or not, he’s being held up as a necessary and iconic role model for an entire generation of Americans, especially but not exclusively young African American men. This isn’t a bad thing. And you know what? When it comes to this aspect of the Obama presidency, progressive blogging and activism be damned.

Secondly, for my own part, I’m proud of this president. I don’t worship him, nor am I a disciple in any way shape or form. And I have, in fact, disagreed with several of his decisions, most recently his Treasury secretary’s bank rescue plan. But after eight years of being ashamed of the president, and after two years of working every day to elect this president, I’ve earned a few months of pride in this victory, pride in our candidate and satisfaction in knowing that the current president is, in many ways, worthy of representing you and me on the world stage.

I hasten to add that my support for the president isn’t limitless. Nor has my support been consistent or unconditional, even this early. I suspect this is the case with many of us on the fringes of the blogotubes. So don’t panic, Glenn.

That said, there’s a chance that the Colbert maxim: “Reality Has A Well Known Liberal Bias” might also apply to President Obama. He might actually do a terrific job and, so, reality might dictate that we say now and then, “Hey! President Obama is doing a terrific job.” I would argue that opposing the president solely for the sake of not looking like a sycophant — out of some reputation for hipster progressive cred — is equally as dishonest as blindly worshipping him.

This entry was posted in President Obama and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • J

    The only people I’ve ever heard say Obama is God are Obama-haters putting words into liberals’ mouths.

  • http://www.broadwaycarl.blogspot.com Broadway Carl

    I agree, Bob. It’s the same reason I disagree with the “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss” meme. (Heh, “meme.”) That they’re all he same whether they’re Republicans or Democrats is something with which I don’t concur.*Oh, he’s sending troops into Afghanistan, therefore he’s the same as everyone else* is another example of being intellectually honest.

  • http://unrelatedcontent.com/wordpress/rick-sanchez-of-cnn-is-tweeting-his-knee-surgery Travis D

    “Obama-haters”?

  • Jeff

    J is right….it seems 90% of those calling him the Messiah are blowhards from the right.Bob, thanks for posting this and for your rebuttal. I have thought to myself, what is the difference between the fools thought Bush was sent from God to protect us after 9/11(a notion that seems even more extremely ridiculous now than it did 7 years ago) and those of us who think Obama is doing a great job. You nailed it. Awesome.

  • eve

    I want him to do well so I’m sure that colors my perception to some degree. However, as much as I like and admire him, I have never expected to like everything he does. I was an enthusiastic supporter during the campaign even though I disagreed with some of his policy positions. I believe the best we can ever hope for is a leader with whom we agree with most of their positions and who has the character traits we believe are needed. Then we push on the issues on which we disagree.I think I am like many people in that I am hesitant to be too critical of someone who has only been in office for two months and faces such huge problems that have no easy answers.

  • camel54

    eve said exactly what I was thinking so just read her comment twice. I do have one addition, though. After eight years of Bush, just like any lengthy period with any absolute horror, any hope at all seems like salvation. Maybe some people are being a little starry eyed, but when you live in a cave long enough, a pinpoint of light can feel like the sun.

  • eve

    Forgot to add another thought. Obama is so different from Bush that the immense relief and hope that I feel most definitely effects my view of Obama and leads me to perhaps be more lenient in critiquing the man. I imagine I’ll eventually get over comparing him to Bush and be more critical, but in the meantime I’m going to enjoy being happy Bush is gone and Obama is president.

  • Lexaburn

    It would seem that some columnists take umbrage at people actually seeking to have confidence in a president. I note that most of these writers seek to be revered, respected, and even admired more than the any president. I tell this Greenwald like I’d tell any political observer writing for the rags, virtual or not: that shit ain’t going to happen with Lexaburn.See, there were times where I actually defended Bush from so-called “liberals,” and there were times when I joined the chorus calling him incompetent. I never took my eye of the fact that I’m an American expecting good judgment on the part of our leaders. This seems to get confused with blind loyalty by those seeking to criticize the actions of others while not being mindful of their own self-aggrandizing practices.What are we now not suppose to question our sources of information? How lost do these journalists believe us to be without them?Why must we suffer pseudo-elitism from semi-parrot journalists attempting to outperform one another? Do these wonks have a problem when we’re defending their every word from critics, too? You know, cuz some of us do that, as well.I’m tired of being talked down to by these know-it-alls. It’s like everyone’s channeling Brainy Smurf or something.

  • Lexaburn

    The Republicons had no confidence in George W. Bush. The party was attempting to build a legacy on the back of the Bush pedigree, until they recognized that the picked the wrong Bush. What looked like blind loyalty was a con game designed not to make their benefactors look solid, but to keep their disingenuous asses relevant. That why they’re looking to Wimpbaugh and Vanity as voices of con-servatism, while the GOP leadership act like sore losers entertaining flights of fancy regarding 2010 and 2012. In terms of political stamina, these GOPunk chumps are spent after keeping the blasted ruse going for seven and a half years. Some of them even have the nerve to play like they weren’t in support of Bush for all those years, the fucking weasels.THAT is what we are up against: a bunch of chumps that run to a swine media enablers in order to stay relevant. Fuck them!

  • http://www.windonwater.net QueenTiye

    First of all, Bob, you have my undying gratitude for this:

    First, some of the God-like Obama adulation comes from segments of society that understandably and quite accurately see his presidency as the beginning of the end of centuries of oppression. No matter what our degree of progressive intellectual honesty might be, we have to acknowledge that to many Americans, President Obama is a figure who isn’t just a politician — he’s a symbol of racial and social achievement. Furthermore, fairly or not, he’s being held up as a necessary and iconic role model for an entire generation of Americans, especially but not exclusively young African American men. This isn’t a bad thing. And you know what? When it comes to this aspect of the Obama presidency, progressive blogging and activism be damned.

    When Allen Iverson and others cut off their braids and go with a clean cut look to emulate the President – you can begin to see just how deeply internalized the impact of President Obama is.Second – people like Greenwald really need to back the eff up on the subject of “worship.” One of the things that pisses me off about the “left” is the amount of bashing of religious people. I get it about the religious right, but the religious right and the religious left are linked by the “religious center” – the vast majority of Americans who may be this or that politically, and who take the “worship” issue quite a bit more personally than the non-religious may realize. Worship belongs to God alone, and adulation of any one person bears no resemblance whatsoever to “worship.” Adulation includes a limiting factor of realizing that a person is indeed human – and will indeed make mistakes. Those of us who are proud of Obama, and happy that he’s doing what he said he would do, are also willing to allow for deviation – not out of a sense of worship – but out of a sense of non-worship. The man is not perfect.Finally – Greenwald and the like were never really Obamaphiles in the first place. That they persist in seeing Obama differently from the way lots of other people see Obama is not a sign of “worship” as much as a continuation of the very dynamic that existed during the election in the first place. Just as you and Elvis were talking about the right wing “most liberal senator” whine prior to the election and the “we thought he was going to be centrist!” after the election complaints, I complain about the “he’s not liberal enough” complaint from the hard left being translated into “anyone who supports Obama is practicing Obama worship” argument. The hard left wouldn’t have, and in fact, DIDN’T elect Obama. They got on the bandwagon of necessity. Fine – but then be honest. The hard left has to do their own heavy lifting to push their agenda – they can’t start namecalling others in the Obama coalition just because we in fact don’t agree with them about everything.QT

  • J

    @ Travis D: Yup. Otherwise know as those who rag on anything Obama does, devoid of any intellectual insight.

  • camel54

    Big kudos to QT.

  • MG

    Cesca, until recently your adoration for the big O WAS bordering on cult-like devotion. Sorry.I think that his obvious “repair the status quo; don’t change it” position has startled a few people, including yourself.I was pleasantly surprised when you used his “Special Olympics” comment as your “Doof Quot[ation] of the Day.”Obviously I don’t worship anyone, being the flaming Tyler Durden-like nihilist (according to you) that I am (not really– an apathetic existentialist).

  • idreamofskiba

    >>>I would argue that opposing the president solely for the sake of not looking like a sycophant — out of some reputation for hipster progressive cred — is equally as dishonest as blindly worshipping him.Thank you!

  • eve

    We are on the same wavelength here, Carmel. If I had read your comment before I wrote my second comment, I would have just said “agree”. You said it so well.

  • AdyLeigh

    What’s the problem? I pray to Obama all the time. It works just as well as praying to any of the other “gods” of mankind’s own making.Is it wrong? Should I stop?

  • idreamofskiba

    But it’s still OK if I find him incredibly handsome, right?

  • http://www.politicalpartypooper.wordpress.com politicalpartypooper

    What’s 11-dimensional-chess?

  • http://tarackian.deviantart.com J M Ashby

    Could not have been said any better Bob.

  • steve adams

    wow! i never knew a presadent could scew up a country in such a short time!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • http://www.windonwater.net QueenTiye

    wow! i never knew a presadent could scew up a country in such a short time!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Irony alert! Irony alert! Irony levels are at critical… take all necessary precautions…QT

  • AdyLeigh

    idream, yes, we can “worship” Obama’s awesome good looks and continue to make empty offers to have his children. That’s fine too.

  • NorCalNative

    Bob, if you think you’ve earned a few months of victory, I’m afraid you fail the “eternal vigilance” test. That’s not how Democracy works and you know it.What are my bona fides you might ask? Well, I cried like a baby during Michelle Obama’s 17-minute speech at the Democratic National Convention, simply because I understood the “Significance” of what his Presidency would mean.However, if you’re having problems with Greenwald’s “unfair shaming” maybe you’re not as politically mature as I thought you were.Bob, while it’s true that you have dissented from some of Obama’s time in office, you’ve been absent from the more serious questions of will we get ALL of our government back?That is, until and if Obama repudiates, turns back, writes signing statements, or Congress does it job, we still have an American government with extra-Constitutional powers.Technically speaking, we really don’t have an actual President until we restore the rule of law and the Constitution. Obama is still keeping some of Bush’s war powers based on the unitary executive theory.Democracy equals eternal vigilance and is NOT a personality contest. I voted for Obama. I like Obama. I’m rooting for Obama.However, I will always hold him to one standard of accomplishment. Is he or isn’t he upholding his oath to protect, preserve and defend the Constitution?Did Glenn Beck take the day off or something?

  • 24hourjack

    beautifully put, bob…even during the debate,and especially now there has been endles debate amongst those i know who voted for the pres.it is simply the nature of progressive types to consistently question even that which we’re reasonably sure we approve of.on the other hand,of all the conservatives i know(im one of two who voted for obama in a family of appx. twenty),i cant get one of them to speak truth about george bush.the farthest theyll go is to say “he spent too much”.and they always,without fail fall back on “he kept us safe after 9/11″.if after four or hopefully eight yrs of pres. obama,my best defense of his presidency is “well,we only had one horrific and historicaly deadly attack on americans during his time”,i’d be ashamed to admit i voted for the guy.

  • MrBrink

    Well said, Bob.

  • http://zenyentav2.blogspot.com zenyenta

    Thank you. A wonderful and somewhat courageous post. Having confidence in the president’s intellect, judgement and overall intentions is not the same as worship.

  • leotia

    Obama is pragmatic, The president is going to go a right and then sometimes to the left. We didnt elected a president to be a crazy liberal. This is common sense politics,i hope all you liberals get your shit together and stop bitching. I fear vote spliting on the left in 2012.and finally Krugman, Dowd shut the hell up. Sometimes, the Left annoys me more than the Right. While the Right destroys others with no remorse, the Left eats its own