You Are In So Much Trouble, Jon Stewart

Scarborough is the strong safety who plays the man, not the ball…and draws the EFFING STUPID pass interference calls.

Cramer is scheduled to appear on tomorrow night’s Sail Show. I don’t think that this will work out well for Cramer. He’ll probably cancel at the last moment when it hits him that this is a bad idea. If Cramer was smart, obviously he’s not, he would just ignore Stewart and hope it all blows over.Joe, on the other hand, deserves everything Stewart will give him and then some. Joe hasn’t got the brains to battle Jon.Stock Advice: Reddenbacher – Strong Buy.

*Sail Show – Daily Show.proofreading, I’ve heard of it.

I didn’t know Arianna wrote the ‘forward’ of your book, Bob! Who wrote the backword?Proofreading, Joe’s never heard of it.

If this really is about Cramer and what Stewart said about him, I wouldn’t be too worried. I don’t know what Joe’s up to, but Cramer will do just fine with Stewart. Anyone who thinks he won’t is dreaming.

I was a fan of Cramer and all the little Bud Foxs’ at CNBC. In my time watching the channel, I’d always been acutely aware that they were a bunch of, shall we say, sycophants. However, a year or so ago they, at least in my view, knew their place. It wasn’t until the dawn of the primaries where there began an increase in political obfuscation. It became increasingly clear that the CNBC crew were mostly, let’s say “not fans of the Democrats.” It was also clear that they were all depressed because they understood that, inevitably, a Democrat would win the presidency. Hillary was the clear favorite. Some of the reporters early on took timid pot shots at her, and treated Obama like an afterthought. About midway through the Dem primary, it became clear that they were all Republicon scum, but were banking on Clinton to, at least continue their market manipulation games. When Hillary began losing her goddamned mind, as well as the election (mid-March), they were squarely in her corner, some overtly, some subtly. When Hillary conceded, they proceeded to laud every single aspect of GOP’s and McCain’s political posturing, while lambasting just about everything the Democrats and Obama were speaking on. It was to be expected by a critical thinker like myself. I knew the market would begin to collapse. I knew that the bozos at CNBC would begin talking down investing in America in response to Obama becoming inevitable (with forked tongues they claim to support America in total). I knew there would be an increase in financial scandals (scapegoats), criticizing (deviations), and kvetching over nonsense (psychos!). The scum on the channel now are the meager residual effect of a larger dirt pool within the swine media.I watched the degradation of a decent infotainment channel over seven or so years. I do not feel good about it. I was a fan of Cramer (he’s taken his lumps better than the other suck-ups). I was a fan of Bartiromo (she’s a floosy that got caught with her hand in the cookie jar, actually). A fan of Haines (still am, actually – he’s at least an honest, old school financial news barbarian). Faber is a great reporter. Watch his documentaries to understand this. Even Kudlow gets my respect, still (he’s a true product of Reagonism, which is harmless, in my view). The rest of the CNBC bottom-feeding sycophants I couldn’t give two shits about. Their presence actually brings down the rep of the station, and I don’t care to go into what I think about them.Cramer is…disappointing.I really have no interest in seeing Stewart eviscerate Cramer for our amusement. I just want some, ANYONE, to just be goddamned honest for once. We all know they’re scamming, so stop fronting and start being up front.Never mind…I’m too naive, and I need to rest.My prayers to all those killed in just the latest in what is sure to become a series of mass shootings.Toodles, poodles.

Check out the article below, by Gabriel Winant at Salon. He analyzes CNBC quite well, and the article is also quite funny.http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/03/11/cnbc/

The only one so far that I have seen any honesty and I only give him about 10% so far is Faber… he did House of Cards about the Housing Bubble and actually put the blame square on the mortgage brokers, Bush, Greenspan, Gramm and Wall St. bankers.. He briefly mentioned Bill Clinton, but only in that he signed the Gramm bill to deregulate the lending. Other than that it was all Bush & Co.If you haven’t seen it and get a chance it is worth the time to watch it..

You are probably right.. they tried with Michael Moore and he fought back hard.. so they are looking for someone else.. Well I don’t see Jon Stewart sitting still for it either.

OT but important….Rachel has Meghan McCain on tonight… this ought to be good…lol

At this point, I think it would just bother Scarborough more for Stewart to, by and large, continue to ignore Morning Joe. Joe is constantly bitching about Jon Stewart on his show, maybe he feels a little attention starved that he doesn’t get on enough.

@sammyscooge: I’ve been noticing too that Bob’s not showing up on the top slot. I keep waiting for it to be just my imagination, but as it turns out, I think it’s no coincidence at all. QT