Carville’s New Book Rips Clinton Campaign

James Carville has a new book coming out. Greg Sargent reports on the more juicy bits, including:

Mark Penn, Carville says, was a key factor in Hillary’s defeat, because he “suffered fatal confusion on the subject of delegates.” Carville hits Penn for reportedly not understanding that California was not a winner-take-all state, so his strategy hinged too heavily on winning it. Carville terms this a “spectacular error.”

This was the political equivalent of a surgeon amputating the wrong leg. A blunder of epic proportions. I’m shocked that Penn is able to find work now.

This entry was posted in Election 2008 and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Theghostsong

    If Mark Halperin still has a job, then its not shocking to me that ANYONE still has one.

  • eve

    Incredibly bad campaign. Not as bad as McCain’s, but incredibly bad nevertheless. Those campaigns showed that neither should be in charge of the country.Although Hillary seems to be an excellent Sec. of State.

  • JeremyB

    Also a key factor in Hillary’s defeat: Barack Obama.

  • Jan

    Didn’t Hillary pay Penn around 10 MILLION or so for his consulting?I’d say she needs to not pay that.

  • D. C.

    Hillary ran a bad campaign. She only managed to hang on for as long as she did because she has fanatical supporters, Carville being one of them.Not that I’m the least bit interested in what Carville has to say, but wasn’t Penn’s moronic misconception about the California primary discussed months ago already? Does he actually have anything new to add?