"[I]f somebody can be water-tortured six times a day, then it isn't torture."
Just remarkable. Even after the Bush OLC memos admit that all of these techniques were, in fact, torture, Limbaugh is still trying to obfuscate the definition.
If it's not torture, and KSM could easily withstand it, then why bother in the first place? You're negating your own argument in support of torture, Limbaugh. Or better yet, put yourself to the test. Hitchens tried it. Why can't you? If it's so innocuous, why not experience first hand what all the fuss is about.