Here Comes The Sludge

Sorry. That was an awful headline.

Not quite as awful as this:

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that the Clean Water Act does not prevent the Army Corps of Engineers from allowing mining waste to be dumped into rivers, streams and other waters.

In a 6-to-3 decision that drew fierce criticism from environmentalists, the court said the Corps of Engineers had the authority to grant Coeur Alaska Inc., a gold mining company, permission to dump the waste known as slurry into Lower Slate Lake, north of Juneau. [...]

The corps permit, issued in 2005, said that 4.5 million tons of waste from the Kensington mine could be dumped into the lake even though it would obliterate life in its waters. The corps found that disposing of it there was less environmentally damaging than other options.

“Less environmentally damaging than other options?” It’s simply remarkable how a corporation can be allowed to function even though its entire business model relies upon choosing how much nature it intends to destroy in the process.

This entry was posted in Environment and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://politicalpartypooper.wordpress.com/ Political Party Pooper

    Yeah, but Bob, it’s gold! Come on! If we find enough of it, we can buy the rest of the world and carry out our plans for world domination (or fund health care?)! What’s one little lake against that?

  • http://oneceltsview.blogspot.com/ Wolfe_Tone

    What’s worse, Bob, is that this probably paves the way for the development of the Pebble Mine Project.It’s never about protecting the environment.It’s about extracting the resources and profiting from them.

  • http://oneceltsview.blogspot.com/ Wolfe_Tone

    What’s worse, Bob, is that this probably paves the way for the development of the Pebble Mine Project.It’s never about protecting the environment.It’s about extracting the resources and profiting from them.

  • http://oneceltsview.blogspot.com/ Wolfe_Tone

    Sorry about the double post.Fuck TypeWad.

  • Atanarjuat

    Let’s see:The livelihood of blue collar workers and the families they support versus strict adherence to radical environmentalist ideology.The choice is clear — unless you’re a liberal.-A

  • http://www.osborneink.com Matt Osborne

    False choice:”The livelihood of blue collar workers and the families they support versus strict adherence to radical environmentalist ideology.”Actual choice:The profits of big business and shareholders versus a living, non-dead environment.

  • http://oneceltsview.blogspot.com/ Wolfe_Tone

    Apparently, if one opposes the destruction of the freshwater and anadromous fish and migratory waterfowl habitat in Lower Slate Lake, you are a “radical environmentalist.”

  • http://arkytek.blogspot.com/ SillyGit

    We can see who the radical planet fucker is in this picture.If that slurry is so wonderful A, perhaps they should dump in your back yard.