Lieberman Wins

Flawless victory.

Senate Democrats emerged from a special caucus meeting Monday night determined to pass a health-care bill by Christmas — but without the Medicare buy-in plan that liberals had sought as an alternative to a government insurance option.

Unacceptable. Expect Lieberman to find something else to bitch about any time now. Also, bring on Ben Nelson and his abortion filibuster. Via Jamie

Adding… I regret the Mortal Kombat reference. This would imply that the Democrats and the White House actually tried to fight back with a procedural change or the like. They didn’t.

Attention Americans aged 55 or older. Joe Lieberman just denied you the opportunity to buy into Medicare — an inexpensive, reliable insurance program. Joe Lieberman did this. And the Democratic Party enabled him. Even the President of the United States collapsed under the weight of Lieberman’s awesome power and gave him what he wanted.

One more thing… The trigger might be out as well. After all, it was one of President Lieberman’s objections.

UPDATE: Ryan Grim has more reactions following tonight’s caucus blockus.

UPDATE 2: Ezra lays out the choices for the White House, leaving no other choice but to capitulate to President Lieberman:

This entry was posted in Healthcare and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://doubledutchpolitics.blogspot.com/ RyanC1384

    I feel sick to my stomach. The idea that one independent has so much pull over this caucus is simply nauseating.Video is now available via CNN:http://doubledutchpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/democrats-strip-medicare-buy-in-from.html

  • Allen Frederick

    This is all political theater. This is always the way it was going to go down. There never was going to be a public option. Ever. The insurance companies would have never allowed it. Now the Democrats get to blame it all on Lieberman in 2010, and the sheep will buy it hook, line, sinker.So what’s the end result? People will now be forced to buy insurance, and not much else. The single biggest corporate giveaway in human history. Well done Democrats.For those who didn’t know what country they live in, welcome to the plutocratic oligarchy.

  • El Mystico

    Slamming. Face. Against. Table.

  • GOVCHRIS1988

    Slamming. Head. With. Toiletseat.Oy.

  • kansasdem

    If the bill that Obama signs into law amounts to little more than a big sloppy kiss for the insurance cartel I predict the lowest Democratic voter turnout in decades for both 2010 and 2012, and possibly much, much longer.Lots and lots of voters will just sit at home and say why bother while we spiral into some kind of theocratic corporate hell. Maybe we should have let McCain win!

  • GOVCHRIS1988

    Ok, heres what I’m wondering. Is that conference committee thing still in play? Can they reconcile this putrid bill with that one, because unless there going that way, I don’t see this being a good bill.

  • http://oneceltsview.blogspot.com/ Wolfe_Tone

    For those who didn’t know what country they live in, welcome to the plutocratic oligarchy.

    I have it on good authority (from Glenn Beck) that it’s actually an “Oligarhy.”.It’s a giant onspiracy, I tell ya!

  • http://broadwaycarl.blogspot.com Broadway Carl

    Just wrote this at my place.

    I have to say I thought the party would hold Lieberman’s feet to the fire and not cave in ONE DAY. Also, does this Christmas deadline seem like bullshit to anyone else? What’s the fucking point if any form of public option, including the Medicare buy-in, is dead?

    Yes, I know that the consumer protection rules that (hopefully) everyone in the Senate agree with are important steps in overall reform, but I can’t begin to tell you how disappointed I feel right now. My only hope is that progressives will give a big FUCK YOU to Rahm, and anyone else in the White House that thinks this is good idea.

    Now that Lieberman is allegedly appeased, I’m waiting for the other shoe to drop and have the Senate include Stupak abortion language to win Ben Nelson’s vote. I’m really disgusted right about now. C’mon, progressives. Fight back!

    And Allen, go fuck yourself.

  • jane

    You may fax Joe to thank him, as I just did, at 202-224-9750, as ALL YOUR MAILBOX ARE BELONG TO FULL. (Wonder why?)

  • Hielo

    No.It’s not about Democrats. It’s about the system.There are still one or two elected people that actually give a shit about the voters. The rest are enjoying their bribes and look forward to those lucrative lobbying jobs in a system that still pretends to be a democracy.We are screwed folks. There is no reason to ever get hopes up about needed and fair legislation. It will never happen again.Massive protests anyone?

  • Allen Frederick

    Broadway Carl,You’re a complete loser. Complete. It’s illiterate children like you masquerading as adults that cause all the problems in this country.Here’s hoping your job is off-shored and your right to vote rescinded. It’s time to start marginalizing ignoramuses such as yourself. The country simply cannot afford it anymore.

  • http://broadwaycarl.blogspot.com Broadway Carl

    Finally, Allen Frederick blames someone else other than Obama. Yes, Allen, it’s all my fault that douchebags think they know better and make a “statement” by voting for Nader (no offense, Bob, you know better). Poverty is my fault. Crime is my fault. Republicans are my fault. A fucked political system is my fault. Sarah Palin is my fault. Fox News Channel is my fault.You’re absolutely right. I’m masquerading as an adult while you masquerade as someone who thinks they know better than everyone else with their “I told you so” attitude. I’m masquerading as an adult while you wish for further US jobs to be lost (via me personally), and my voting rights to be taken away.Who did you vote for in 2008, Allen? Obama? Then you voted just as stupidly as I did. McCain? Then you lost and are crying in your beer. Bob Barr or Ron Paul? Then you’re a complete dick. Complete.

  • kansasdem

    Enough with the circular firing squad kids!The sad thing is we’re all just disappointed in the performance of our elected officials, yet we end up sniping at each other over slightly different views.STOP!

  • Rogect8

    I say again – The horror! The horror!And since we’ve been on the topic of parliamentary procedure lately, I hereby second Carl’s motion for Allen-the-troll to go fuck himself (honestly…who responds to the operator of a blog by referring to him as ‘illiterate’ in the comments section of another blog? That doesn’t even make sense…)

  • http://broadwaycarl.blogspot.com Broadway Carl

    Kansasdem – Yes, I’m upset that things didn’t go the way that we hoped they would. But frankly I’m a little tired of commenters/trolls coming to a place that I consider a home and saying “I told you so.” This Allen Frederick person is a relatively new commenter on this site, unless it’s an alias used by previous assholes. So I call bullshit when I read things like “This is all political theater. This is always the way it was going to go down. There never was going to be a public option. Ever. No one could possibly know that. Either that or they must be pretty miserable going through life with such a cynical mindset.Sorry to have upset you.

  • eve

    good post, CarlI will add that anyone who would write that they hoped another commenter would lose their job is a true lowlife.

  • jhw22

    I am waiting until tomorrow. I am still holding out for a little can of whoop-ass opened by the President.The President asked for certain prinicples:•Reduce long-term growth of health care costs for businesses and government•Protect families from bankruptcy or debt because of health care costs•Guarantee choice of doctors and health plans•Invest in prevention and wellness•Improve patient safety and quality of care•Assure affordable, quality health coverage for all Americans•Maintain coverage when you change or lose your job•End barriers to coverage for people with pre-existing medical conditionsHe never asked for the PO or for the Medicare buy in, yet these principles are being met by a number of mechanisms in the bills. But I still think that Obama wants a tool that will keep the insurance companies honest especially if we have a mandate. Obama didn’t campaign on the mandate, that was his major distinction from Hillary, so now that we have the mandate, I think he will get us something. I think he has been waiting until the whip was needed to thrash it. Two, three months ago would have been too early. Now, I think he needs to thrash it and I think tomorrow’s meeting will be quite telling.Something’s up. They aren’t losing a chance for a significant tool that will “Assure affordable, quality health coverage for all Americans”. They haven’t even seen the CBO report yet.Jennifer

  • aview999

    What now?Like the first commenter, I feel sick. wrote the WH telling Obama to:END THE WARSPUT SINGLE PAYER BACK ON THE TABLE!And last but not least:FIRE RAHM!!LIke he’ll do that…

  • http://nanotyrnns.blogspot.com/ Nanotyrannus

    To add to Carl’s post, Frederick’s ilk come here and take us to task, endlessly, for our support of the President but take offense when we hit back at them over their eternal refrain “I told you so.” If they can’t get as good as they give, they can fuck off and go haunt some other blog.

  • Allonfla

    @aview999: you are not helping.

  • http://doubledutchpolitics.blogspot.com/ RyanC1384

    I admire your optimism Jennifer, but unfortunately I cannot share it. Over the first year of his presidency I’ve come to the realization that Obama is exactly what we think he is…a brilliant intellectual who looks for the middle ground in nearly every policy decision. This is usually viewed as admiral on most fronts in life. The irony is it’s destructive in the political America of today. One of massive differences cut sharply along party lines and a polarized electorate. If the reports are true that Rahm Emanuel met personally with Reid today to urge him to compromise with Lieberman, then we can kiss true progressive reform goodbye. This shows that the president is willing to sacrifice to make sure his most important domestic agenda passes in some form. All is not lost in this bill, but a sweeping progressive agenda that changes America will not be what is recorded. I will wait to see what comes from the meeting at the White House tomorrow, but a word of advice would be not to hold your breathe on the president putting his foot down on this legislation.http://doubledutchpolitics.blogspot.com/

  • http://politicalpartypooper.wordpress.com/ Political Party Pooper

    Carl,”I’m masquerading as an adult while you masquerade as someone who thinks they know better than everyone else with their “I told you so” attitude”Carl, no one knows better than me, not even Allen.:D

  • Rogect8

    @ Jennifer – good points. How quickly we all forget the debates, in which Hillary and Obama went back and forth probably a dozen times concerning the relative merits of the mandates. Personally, I think Obama had it right the first time. But if you’re gonna include the mandates, you’ve gotta be SURE to include adequate consumer protections.But regarding Obama opening up a can of whoop-ass….well, I think you’d be hard pressed to find ANYBODY who thinks that it’s pure coincidence that all of this Lieberman bullshit is coming just 2 days before the President heads off to Copenhagen for the Climate Change Conference…I hope you’re right though. He needs to start cracking that whip, and in a hurry. If ever there was a time, this is it.

  • http://www.bobcesca.com Bob_Cesca

    jhw wrote:>>>He never asked for the POYes he did. It’s always been a part of his healthcare plan going all the way back to the campaign.

  • jane

    Well, “Alan”, with yer “conspiracies, I hope ye cry yerself to sleep tonight on yer huge pillow after hearing this: Both Carl and I have fairly secure jobs, re: shipping overseas, cause we work in the AHHHHH sociocommy THEATRE world. Heavens. What’s next??

  • Lexaburn

    Yes, it should be apparent to anyone that this Allen person is a Republicon troll. The “children” insult, and that insufferable condescension they, in their small minds, believes intimidates. The fucker’s avoided answering direct queries posted by myself twice, including those Carl has asked. Ridicule the bastard next time s/he shows for that shit about “off-shoring.” He must think he’s a god-damned Cheney or something, the whelp.So…Rahm tells Reid to deal with things, and a compromise is made. There’s your problem right there. Rahm’s dumb for thinking Reid could actually do anything besides cave. Looks to me that in this case, Rahm is the culprit, but that’s just me. Lieberman’s going to do what he’s going to do because he’s a brat. Reid’s going to be ReidWhat are we going to do with these people? I’m not giving up on this party, but there is a reason I’m registered Independent, though I often vote Democrat.This is some bad juju, though, I tell you. Someone needs to be kicked the hell out of somewhere. Who? Any suggestions, because I’ve spoken on who I’d throw under the bus at this point. How does it happen? Seriously – HOW!!!

  • Stranahan

    Bob and I are suddenly in agreement!

  • aview999

    @AllonflaWhat in the hell do you mean?I’ll tell you what…I’m totally frustrated by this Admin ability to manage anything these days.END THE WARS – think of the LIVES and money saved!SINGLE PAYER – our country needs HELP!And RAHM E – like he hasnt had his disgusting hand on every single thing coming out of the WH?I’m not helping WHAT?!BITCHING? Last I heard, wasnt against the LAW.So fuck off.

  • Lexaburn

    I’m discussing this right now offline with some friends. We are all in agreement as we watch Olbermann….There’s a rat somewhere in this WH, not “rats,” one “rat.”Any guesses as to who said “rat” is, folks?I’m betting Obama jettisons someone very significant early next year. It may not be who I think it is, but I’d be very happy if it was. Very happy.It’s too obvious now that someone very close to the president has to go. Obama may be too cautious to do it, though, but it needs to be done like yesterday.

  • Stranahan

    Although…the news earlier SHOULD have been Bob going after the White House for ordering this compromise – not a knee jerk reaction trying to kill the messenger. That’s been the pattern here for months, though – defend the President.The fact that some people here still ‘hold out hope’ despite all the evidence of what President Obama actually stands for is just so sad…like a kid with an alcoholic Dad hoping that this year Santa will deliver a bonanza instead of the unwrapped crap they got last year.And Nano – I DID tell you so. What not SFU and listen?

  • http://doubledutchpolitics.blogspot.com/ RyanC1384

    I have posted a thoughtful response to the events of today on my blog…I’m not a big fan of the attacks being leveled in this comment area so if you would like to comment on my post please take a minute to read my blog. Take care everyone and let’s see what happens tomorrow.http://doubledutchpolitics.blogspot.com/

  • Lexaburn

    If Obama stands for what I’m guessing is “nothing,” so do all who voted for him. That’s the rub, Chicken Little.If we put all our faith in him, how much did we really have?I’m willing to take the responsibility of my vote and my support for this president, not churlishly launch accusations, labels, and invectives at him like some of you.I’m standing still, because I know the GOP has NOTHING to offer.I am still of the belief that there’s a rodent giving bad advice to this administration. Knock Obama’s poor judgment for picking the…ok, person, but at least observe the entire spectrum, which is what I’m attempting to do. We’ve still got three years to go in this, and stumbles were bound to happen. Something needs to be done about the…individual to which I’m referring.

  • http://doubledutchpolitics.blogspot.com/ RyanC1384

    “There will be setbacks and false starts. There are many who won’t agree with every decision or policy I make as president.”I’m willing to stand behind him as well Lexaburn…but I do not hold the same conviction that there is a rat somehow in the white house. I wonder if you can expand on what you’re thinking with that?

  • GOVCHRIS1988

    Mr.Stranahan,What do we do? What do we do? So now, you have pointed out to us that President Obama is a corporate sell out hellbent on helping his corporate bosses rather than the American people. You have proven to us that we were wrong with electing him. Who could have been better at this? You must know, surely.I am a 21 year old black college student from the state of Georgia who’s first vote in the primary as well as general election went to President Obama. A guy, who after eight long years of no hope, brought me some. I always knew change was slow and hard fought, but I believed that we all had to fight to get it there. I don’t know anymore. Voting third parties, while it is high in principle, is irrelevant. They never win. Name one Presidential election where the independent candidate broke 25% of the vote? Even if I do that, they would never get elected. So I had a choice, as we all do, between the two parties. The Republicans, who have pillaged this country to where we are at now, or the Democrats, who have left us with a record that shines brighter than the last three Republican presidents that we did have. Those were our choices. To this day, I’m proud of my choice, I don’t regret my choice, and I still have hope. Today’s situation strengthened my hopes, because I believe it won’t be like this in the future.So, Mr. Stranahan, you can blame the President for everything that has come to pass, but it won’t solve the problem. So, what do we do?

  • jane

    “Although…the news earlier SHOULD have been Bob going after the White House for ordering this compromise – not a knee jerk reaction trying to kill the messenger.”Posted by: Stranahan [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 14, 2009 10:56 PMYeah, Bob shoulda been bitching before there was a reason to bitch. Also, attacking Obama before Obama has been on record doing anything worth bitching about in this health care three-ring circus.”And Nano – I DID tell you so. What not SFU and listen?”Posted by: (guess who??) Stranahan [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 14, 2009 10:56 PMJeesus christ on a fucking triscuit, Lee, will you EVER understand why people have dogpiled on you? Hint: IT’S NOT BECAUSE OF YOUR GODDAMN OPINIONS. It’s PURELY because of your smug asshattery. Yet you continue. And you call Nano and others stupid…

  • eve

    I just sent Lieberman an email. Not that it will matter to him, but I did feel a smidge better telling him what a disgrace he is.

  • Lexaburn

    Ryan,My friend and I are in agreement that poor advice based on…let’s say “political repercussions” are being considered more than what the public can and will accept. I’ve seen this all throughout this past year of political ups and downs. I’m not done with my observations, as I’m now expanding the scope beyond this year into next year, but there’s some weird shit going on involving those elections next year. Much of what is irking some of us may have to do with how next year plays out.I’m not going to stand by and watch some leap to the conclusions that Obama is “selling out” to anyone because it was always in his nature. I refuse to have people I believe are smarter than that insult my intelligence. Taking a critical look at the current situation, and do mind that I’m a registered Independent with no past allegiances with either party, really, I’m seeing odd compromises that lock out the Republicons almost completely, yet make scalawag Dems all too important. It’s completely baffling. This strategy needs to be changed ASAP, especially in the coming year.Now I’ve been reading up on a few of Obama’s picks, and the one that stands out is Rahm Emmanuel. It seems to me that this cat is the one proposing these odd compromises with Dems, not necessarily President Obama himself. I say this because…quite frankly, in reading some of his history, Rahm appears to be very callous and extremely cautious as to not appear fallible, which is definitely something I cannot see in Obama. Rahm is the weak link, though it appears he’s clean as a whistle. I read and hear the criticisms aimed at the man, and I’ve taken them all with a grain of salt in the past. What went down today…can’t do it anymore. There’s something going on with this Emmanuel dude, and it’s not benefiting the WH one iota.This is all just my opinion, but I’m stressing that I’m standing with Obama, come hell or high water. That includes if the ship sinks due to the administration attempting stand the heat or drink the water drowning it. I stand by the decision I made last year. Who else?

  • http://nanotyrnns.blogspot.com/ Nanotyrannus

    Strananhan sez (as fucking usual)

    “The same fucking thing he always says, in that same smarmy tone, while never offering any new insight to whatever latest Obama two-faced trickery he is currently bemoaning, and somehow always leaving out an effective strategy (and no, getting Bob to something you want him to do is not a strategy).”

    That’s why I don’t SFU and listen, Lee. You have nothing to say.

  • Rogect8

    Oh, Lee. Is there anything Lieberman et al. can do that you WON’T blame on Obama?Also, it’s interesting to me that Nano called out Allen, and then YOU responded to Nano as if he’d attacked you personally. Weird.

  • JackDanieL

    I too sent Lieberman an email tonight, and I too feel that it was probably pointless. But, IF he does read it and IF one of his family members does get very ill and private insurance does cause them further pain, perhaps he will silently and droopily curse that punkass from San Diego for wishing it all upon him.

  • jane

    Lexy, I totally see that, re: Rahm.(And I sure as fuck hope you’re right. Cause while I thought “fuck yeah” when I heard he was hired by Obama, I sure as fuck haven’t thought it much since.)

  • dansolomon

    I just don’t get the idea that floats around here that Lieberman is actually that powerful, and he’s genuinely capable of undermining Obama to the extent that he has, without that power being given to him by Reid and the White House. One Senator – even the potential 60th vote for cloture – doesn’t get that sort of influence unless someone else has decided that he should have it.From the reports today, that was Rahm Emmanuel, acting on behalf of President Obama. When the Chief of Staff insists that the rest of the Senate should just give the guy what he wants, then they obviously shoulder the blame. It’s silly to pretend that Lieberman really has all of this power on his own. He has it because he’s not at risk of losing his committee assignments and the influence that comes with them, regardless of what he does or says. He has it because he’s not in a position where he actually has to filibuster anything, he only has to threaten. It’s very easy to be Joe Lieberman right now, because the myth that he must come on board for any legislation to pass has become so accepted that people are using it to absolve the President of any blame here.It’s just weird.I’m from Texas, and my Senators – John Cornyn and Kay Bailey Hutchison – can and will filibuster this bill, no matter what, and they’ll do it proudly. They’ll be heroes to their base when they’re done. Lieberman will be reviled by his constituents if he actually filibusters the bill, and he’ll be of diminished use to his backers if he’s stripped of his committee positions. He’s only powerful because he’s not been put in a position where those things could actually happen. He’s not supernatural.–d

  • jane

    Here’s what I faxed Lieberman tonight (since his voicemail is Full Of Win).

  • jane

    Sorry, Dan, I just needed a nice place to vent tonight and Lieberman felt like a nice dumping ground. Also, he’s a hypocrite. And he’ll still vote against anything the Democrats may propose. So he deserves a little wrath.

  • Allonfla

    @Aview99 or whatever: (in my condescending talking to a child voice): Please refer to your first post, re-read my first post and then read your response to me and then you will see how you are not helping. You are frustrated, not 12 years old. Act like an adult.

  • JackDanieL

    I sorta agree with Dan S.I refuse to believe that this guy cant be shaken down – or at the very least, called out daily for his obvious whoring to his true constituents (all based in Hartford).I am willing to bet that 95% of Americans, hell 95% of those who would support health care/insurance reform, dont even realize how this process works and how this one man has ground the entire thing to a halt.6billion+ people on this planet and I only truly hate 2 of them, Joe makes the listHe is a piece of garbage and clearly, unabashedly, represents everything wrong with our system.50 states – 100 Senators – 51 should be the law, period. Dont like it? Then you better get your shit together to make sure your party wins seats.Accountability is a sonofabitch!

  • Allonfla

    Some facts:He is not nor will he ever be a knee-jerk reactionary type so there will be no public smack down of Joe nor rumors of one that happened behind closed doors. We have to get used to his personality.If the PO and the medicare buy-in are indeed done, then the Left needs to start paying attention to other parts of the bill. There is so much focus on the PO that I fear you guys are overlooking items that are too weak or need to be removed. You can still leave your mark on this bill, do not let Joe demoralize you or he will win AGAIN.If there is one person I will defend more than the president, it’s Rahm. Stop, stop, stop bashing this guy. I don’t care what he did before getting hired by Obama – he speaks FOR the president. To suggest that he is just going rogue and doing dirty shit like this, is to suggest that we elected an empty vessel with no mind of his own. We did not elect Sarah Palin.Start putting some of the blame on the Progressives and Liberals in the Senate. Almost every day one of them is making a promise for this or that and they don’t deliver. Occasionally a few of them will call out the President on tv, but I don’t see them getting any votes for HCR and I sure as hell don’t see them calling out each other in public either.I still have confidence in Obama and this is not going to shake it. I do, however, give a vote of no confidence in Congress. Can they hand something to the president without watering it down so much?And someone on here mentioned that O’s presidency or his agenda will not be seen in the books as Progressive. I say, you don’t know what’s going to happen, you don’t know what the history books will say. Hell, you don’t even know how you are going to feel about him in 2 weeks much less years from now. Stop writing Obama off.

  • Stranahan

    “Smug asshattery” = telling the truth all along about Rahm and Obama even though it wasn’t popular among some people on this site.Okay, I can deal with that.And no – Nano is smart. Genius, obviously. That better?

  • Stranahan

    This is from TPM….”An aide briefed on discussions with the White House says that there would be no story if Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel hadn’t interceded. The aide confirmed an account, reported by Huffington Post, that Emanuel visited Reid personally, telling him to cut a deal with Lieberman.Then the aide provided more detail.Emanuel didn’t just leave it to Reid to find a solution. Emanuel specifically suggested Reid give Lieberman the concessions he seeks on issues like the Medicare buy-in and triggers.”Frankly, Bob owes me an apology.

  • Lexaburn

    I recall a few articles about how Obama’s political strategy changing once he got into the WH. Different than he was on the campaign trail – more cautious. This momentous revelation occurred specifically within two months of Obama’s presidency, during the stimulus debate. Something’s up, I tell you.Dare I say it, Rahm may be…going rogue.The embarrassment of the situation may be too dire to consider for this president, especially within an election year. However, I’m sensing it all to be true.Castigate Obama on the indecision, but I’m telling you all, why would a “leak” commit to such detail? I’ve been sensing Emmanuel is a braggart that throws his weight around.In dealing with the Dems, specifically, and a few ‘Con stragglers, this has all the signs of politicking most foul. I’m not seeing this coming from Obama himself. Something is going down in the WH. Not a sellout, but an undermining, however minuscule.

  • Stranahan

    I wrote this about Rahm / Obama a month ago Badfellas : How Rahm And My President Killed Health Reform http://ow.ly/Md2s

  • jane

    “Nano is smart. Genius, obviously. That better?”It’s a fucking start.”Frankly, Bob owes me an apology.”Posted by: Stranahan [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 15, 2009 1:24 AMFrankly, Bob owes you the biggest bitchslap you have never received. And I’d say even more but I’m a goddamn lady.

  • Mather Z

    “Frankly, Bob owes me an apology.”And you owe use one shred of a constructive idea instead of sniping from the sidelines.Let’s all close our eyes and pretend that you were indeed “telling the truth all along about Rahm and Obama”. So what? How does that help? In the absence of anything remotely productive, well yeah, it IS smug asshattery. Plus I seem to recall you supporting one presidential candidate over another…It’s way easier to snark from a distance than it is to take any meaningful action, which is why you’re stuck doing the former and – I suspect – incapable of doing the latter.Prove me wrong, champ.

  • eljefejeff

    Lee, Obama hasn’t signed a health care bill yet. When he does, if he does, THEN we can pass judgment on that one issue. It hasn’t even been a year in his term and would you not agree he has more on his plate than any president since at least FDR, maybe Lincoln or even any president in history?Has Obama disappointed on many issues? Yes. Am I glad he’s the one making decisions regarding terrorism, wars, jobs, climate change, health care, etc rather than any republican in the country? Absolutely. Maybe you’d rather Bush or McCain or Palin. Nader is not a choice. He will never ever be the president. Joe Lieberman has a better chance.

  • Stranahan

    Mather – I’ve done the same thing Bob has done – write articles, urge activism – except I’ve been correct on where the problem in reform was.What have you done? Snark from comments? Nice.Prove me wrong, chump.

  • brentblah

    First off, Allonfla has a point. Calling out Progressive/Liberal members is something that should be done. Maddow put it well tonight when she was talking with Senator Wyden. When he went into the standard “we’re gonna do what we need to do for the American people” spiel, she sharply noted, “I can tell the contrast between when you and I have talked about what is possible in health reform today versus what we’ve talked about in previous days.”The same senators that are supposed to have been fighting for us this whole time are now saying “We’re not gonna get everything we want.”We already knew this. We knew this from the moment that single payer was off the table. These guys, while I’m sure they don’t want to use the harsh language that many of us would like to, need to be putting the feeling of dissatisfaction up front. Ignoring whether Obama has/has not sold us out or has/has not been forceful enough in pushing for (at least) the Public Option, our supposed “liberal” congresspeople have very quickly and quietly rolled over for what seems the sake of getting something, anything, passed.Secondly, Lee:You have yet to answer the point that I believe many that are angry with you have posed. What do you think should be done if, as you say, we have been collectively hornswaggled by our President/his administration?Whether Bob is right or you are, what do YOU think should be done by your fellow progressives at this point to at least begin to push things in our direction?If this post seems rambling, please forgive me. It was a very long day.

  • J M Ashby

    Lee – If you want to be taken seriously as anything other than a complete jerkoff and waste of attention, you should probably avoid prefacing your arguments by telling people to STFU or labeling them as chumps.Demanding apologies and claiming that you have been the soul voice of reason when you were anything but, also goes a long away toward demonstrating what a shinning beacon of pompousness you are.This mess deffinantly does not look good for Obama, but in my opinion it looks much worse for the Senate than the President.More than anything else, it exposes the senate for what it is. An organization of grossly corrupt dinosaurs scrambling to get the biggest piece of the corporate pie.Everyone’s anger should be directed at the Senate, not Obama. That is unless you believe Obama should subvert the constitution and do things without the approval of congress. Is that what you want? You would probably bitch about tha too given the opportunity.If you said Obama hasn’t pushed hard enough for healthcare, you may be right, but blaming it all on him is not rational. This entire situation should display to everyone loud and clear that the rules of the senate need to change.Do not forget, healthcare isnt even up for vote yet. The threat of filibuster is only for stopping the DEBATE on healthcare. If one single senator can stop a subject from even being debated, the system is fucked and so is the american citizen.

  • http://www.bobcesca.com Bob_Cesca

    Stranahan:>>>>Frankly, Bob owes me an apology.For what? This is all about you, isn’t it, Lee. “I was right!” “Bob owes me an apology!” yada yada. Utterly insufferable. At no time, Lee, have you and your awesome powers of deduction been able to come up with a viable path to passing this bill. NEVER. Instead, you’re repeating OVER AND OVER this flimsy argument about how the president is a sell-out — a case you would’ve made regardless of the outcome of the bill. Way to go. Clever.What you don’t get is that there are Senate Democrats who don’t give a rip about the White House and would rather piss on the heads of liberals for sport. While I wish Rahm Emanuel hadn’t conceded so quickly, I really don’t know what else could’ve been done short of passing legislation to abolish the filibuster.Furthermore, this thing isn’t over yet. But your premature gloating has made your motivations perfectly clear.

  • http://politicalpartypooper.wordpress.com/ Political Party Pooper

    JM,The debate is already happening. Fillibuster simply stands in the way of moving from debate to actual business of voting on legislation.This current problem can be solved, if Reid and co are willing, without needing to turn Lieberman or Nelson.Reid needs to force the Repubs and Lieberman to actually start talking. Then, he needs to clear the Senate agenda, and allow no other business to come before the floor, keeping as the only item on the agenda the health care reform bill. This would mean that opposition would have to speak indefinitely.The one act that was moved from floor to vote this way that I recall was the Civil Rights Act, in which Strom Thurmond’s attempt to fillibuster was defeated by leader Mike Mansfield, who simply cleared the senate agenda, and eventually forced the issue to a vote.Now is the time to do this, as the holidays are here. No better time to force matters to a head than when “Christian” conservatives are wanting to go home and spend Christmas with their families.Also works for the Jewish holiday.Make them speak. They can’t do it, and they won’t do it, and Reid forces their hand, this Senate will win the day.

  • Lexaburn

    First off, Lee Stranahan, my apologies if I’m being misunderstood as an irritable Obamabot, but from the closing moment of your piece (which I’d never read, unfortunately), you glossed over EXACTLY what I’m beginning to see emerge: Rahm Emmanuel’s influence. You claim that President Obama is the one not fighting. That he hasn’t gone after some folks within his party for the negative influence. Forgetting the campaign-like rallies he threw calling out those stalling the HCR debate, though, not necessarily focusing on Dems. He did this, and depended on those of us observing to see exactly what has been going on. I have, and I see Dems as more of an influence than Republicans. I say that there’s a conversation going on within the party itself, one that has brought HCR to the forefront more than ever before in my lifetime. We are very close to accomplishing something…but as I say this, again, with the conversation, some of the more unsavory Dems are being placated while others more, errhm, “liberal” are being pushed to the side.The intellectual slight of hand within your article attributes Emmanuel’s words to President Obama himself, though you do try to differentiate by calling out both men. As I’ve stated, I do not believe Obama would call bloggers advocating for HCR “fucking stupid.” We saw what happened the last time the president called something “stupid,” correct? This is not something I’m seeing coming from the WH completely. I’m telling you, that it may be hard for Obama to admit the embarrassment of picking someone so quickly and seemingly in-touch with political forecasts, then having to get rid of the man before the mid-terms, but this is what I’m seeing has to happen. Emmanuel is the weak link. Even the fact that I’ve missed your article, yet now I’m once again reading yet another observation regarding Emmanuel’s demeanor. The deck is stacking against this man being there past the mid-terms, or before they even get here. I’m saying, the dude is a liability. Emmanuel IS the problem, yet I can understand how one can say that the WH, and with that President Obama are responsible for his Chief of Staff’s predisposition. I completely understand, and apologize if you’re sensing my being a bit too defensive of my own perception of Barack H. Obama.Oh, single payer suffered death by guillotine during the primary last year. It was proposed, and scoffed at by the last two contenders. Kucinich was the strongest voice for it, and they made a mockery of him with that UFO bullshit no one but media dorks cared about. Edwards did what he could by hinting at it in his speeches occasionally, but recall the fact that he was perceived as the “other guy” or “the white guy.” Unfortunately, he and Elizabeth were the best chance for “single-payer” being introduced in the “mainstream” lexicon, but the Clintons needed retribution and decided to have their friends at the tabloids blow up Edwards’ Clintonian “baby mama” scandal, which unfortunately, made Liz look just as…guilty as John in some respects.Let’s not get too…conspiratorial, though. All I’m saying is that the GOPussies are not an option for me. I’m waiting for the Dems to get their shit together, make the hard choices that need to be considered, and get shit done. I’m not ready to give up on them in such a short time. My patience wore thin with the god-damned GOP during Clinton’s second term, but the Dems always had time to prove themselves. They just have to understand that the media swine they hobnob with have it in for them, and will cover them unfavorably. With that, they have to take their cases directly to the people themselves, a notion that may be considered daunting to the party as a whole, making them all look like craven so & sos. The GOP has no problem treating the Americans like indentured servants that HAVE to accept the genius of their political maneuvering, but the Dems treat everyone like delicate porcelain dolls that are too fragile to EVER consider moving to dust the areas where they sit even. This attitude of the Dems needs to cease before it is too late.

  • roxsteady

    I’M NOW PRAYING FOR HIS DEATH! HEART ATTACK? STROKE? I DON’T REALLY GIVE A SHIT!

  • http://nanotyrnns.blogspot.com/ Nanotyrannus

    Stranahan sez:

    “Mather – I’ve done the same thing Bob has done – write articles, urge activism – except I’ve been correct on where the problem in reform was.

    Translation:

    “I’ve written on a blog/news aggregator that’s decidedly unfriendly to the President (as any good progressive should) and you ‘unpublished’ folk are but knaves that should be grateful for the insight I’ve been providing you all along and I told you so I told you so I told you so I told you so.”

    Wow! Thanks, Lee! We, the unwashed and truly uninformed, await your penetrating analysis of whatever Obama’s done to piss you off this hour! You’re an article writer! Wow! I can’t help but be starstruck. We humbly submit to your most decidedly qualified opinion on things.It’ll pretty much be the same shit you say all the time anyway, right? And if we all suddenly agree, if we all praise your ability to crystal ball this thing from the very beginning, if we all join you in your chorus “Kill The Bill”, what then? What will you truly have accomplished?