Deficit Fear-Mongering

Paul Krugman nails it:

…the sudden outbreak of deficit hysteria brings back memories of the groupthink that took hold during the run-up to the Iraq war. Now, as then, dubious allegations, not backed by hard evidence, are being reported as if they have been established beyond a shadow of a doubt. Now, as then, much of the political and media establishments have bought into the notion that we must take drastic action quickly, even though there hasn’t been any new information to justify this sudden urgency. Now, as then, those who challenge the prevailing narrative, no matter how strong their case and no matter how solid their background, are being marginalized.

And fear-mongering on the deficit may end up doing as much harm as the fear-mongering on weapons of mass destruction.

Even the White House has succumbed to deficit hysteria. The whole “Americans are tightening their belts, and so should the government” is so ridiculous — unless, that is, it’s merely a political feint and not a serious policy initiative. Which case, fine. I’m more concerned with sustaining the recovery, and the way to screw the pooch is to suddenly pull back on spending.

This entry was posted in Economy and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://politicalpartypooper.wordpress.com/ Political Party Pooper

    Bob,Why are you so dead-set against reigning in spending? Is it because Krugman doesn’t want to reign it in?As intelligent as Krugman is on this subject, I think he is being way too simplistic about it.Especially when you consider the amount of waste in our government. The Feds want us to go Green, and yet our highest office resides in an energy sieve, and the Capitol Building is about as inefficient as they come. Our defense spending is over $500 Billion, and anyone who does not think that there is at least 15% waste in that is naive.The ten year plan shows deficit spending every year…which, I must ask, WHY THE FUCK?And you are complaining because people are a bit frightened? Bob, please answer this question:If not today, and as we have seen, not for the next ten years, WHEN according to you and Krugman, will be the right time to balance the budget and PAY OUR FUCKING BILLS?Or, do you think we can go on deficit spending forever?

  • roxsteady

    It might seem simlistic but, the people pushing this deficit meme are being disingenuious. As I’ve posted previously, the deficit keeps rising because revenue keeps shrinking and, revenue keeps shrinking because we’ve lost 7 million jobs over the last 9 years. We lost those jobs because the Bush administration cut taxes for the rich in 2001 and 2005 saying it spurs investment which spurs job growth. As we’ve seen from Regan and Bush, Reganomics doesn’t work. Regan trippled the deficit and Bush doubled it. Now, unlike a household, the government can’t cut spending at a time when everyone else is. It’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. Nobody is saying ignore the deficit but, if we don’t first, spur job growth there won’t be anything left for our children to have to worry about. Think, the movie “The Day After”.

  • roxsteady

    That’s “disingenuous”. By the way, those tax cuts were in 2001 and 2003 and again, where are all of the jobs that tax cuts for the rich provide? Uninformed voters and stupid Republicans should take their heads out of their asses read a history book. If they did, they’d know that we’ve been here before and we didn’t get out of the Great Depression by CUTTING SPENDING! To pretend otherwise, which Republicans and Teabaggers are doing is just ignorant.

  • Allonfla

    You can’t say the WH has brought into the deficit hysteria because several critics have called Obama a deficit peacock.

  • http://http:.//www.webdunce.blogspot.com webdunce

    Frankly, I don’t care about the deficit. I didn’t care about it in the 80s, or the 00s. Call me ignorant or naive, but day to day, to the average American (of which I count myself) the deficit means absolutely nothing. Bring down health care costs, bring back manufacturing in the US and cut the Pentagon budget by a third and we’ll all be okay. Remember the horror of Bush 1 and the “largest deficit in American history” hysterics? How and why did that disappear in the 90s? Was it all Clinton and dumb luck?

  • jhw22

    Sorry, but I don’t see long-term budgeting as “taking drastic action quickly”. Obama said the other day, when speaking to the Dems that really all he is trying to do in his budget is pay off what he has spent. I don’t see that as hysteria. I also don’t think it’s a bad think to be responsible. Even us libs like responsibility in government. At least that’s what we SAID we wanted in elections.Jennifer