Republicans: The Damned Truth and The Truth Be Damned

by

Oh boy. It’s like trying to fix a stubborn cowlick while wearing boxing gloves.

Republicans just do not, will not, uh uh, want to cooperate in this little thing called Democracy. Period. And their game plan looks like this:

2010-04-03-noYesses

(Pardon the crude attempt at a Vonnegut-like visual aid.)

The proof that they will never, ever let this president — this Democratic president — tell them what’s what is that no matter what he posits in terms of fixing all the things Bush broke, things which always could have been improved upon, things which would benefit less fortunate Americans, things which would restore our prestige abroad, which would restore the warmth to the nation’s character, the Republicans look at him (and by extension the majority of America) with dead eyes, crossed arms and do absolutely nothing.

No alternative plans, suggestions, advice. No involvement, curiosity, no moments of introspection. Allowing violently disposed fringe elements to steer policy when that job used to be the bailiwick of legislators and operatives schooled in poly-sci. It’s an approach that begs the question:

Do Republicans actually like Democracy?

Really. Their strategy seems to be one of complete disdain for the last 200 or so years of that defining American civil exercise. They are behaving as though they’ve discarded all pretense of caring or participation. Weird.

Ooh! I know! Perhaps the Republicans are playing into some master plan wherein all power is gradually, systematically leeched from the masses and centralized into a snug, capitalistic, corporate version of an aristocracy, keeping The People perpetually strained but entertained by shiny yet easily broken/disposable/replaceable baubles and only minimally involved in the basic running of the country so as to provide the citizenry with an illusion of democratic participation and therefore allowing them to distinguish their lives from that of common, old fashioned serfs.

Nah. That would be too simplistic, too 19th century. But back to today:

Even after realizing that Obama, master of many things they aren’t, is also demonstrating a centrist rather than a dreaded leftist approach to governance, in many ways incorporating aspects which they themselves have favored in the past, to put forward his workable agenda as opposed to the armageddon/fascist/socialist dystopia the frothing Republican mouthpieces warned of, they still refuse to play.

Damn vexing! So, what could it be?

Hmm. Could it… is it because… oh, I don’t know… is it because he’s…

…black?

Nah. That would be too simplistic, too 19th century. Oh. Wait a minute…

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • pbfishtaco

    From Blazing Saddles; seems appropriate.Bart: Are we awake?Jim: We’re not sure. Are we… black?Bart: Yes, we are.Jim: Then we’re awake… but we’re very puzzled.

  • Jan Baxter

    Republicans do not like democracy. I’m just learning that there is a campaign to deny that the U.S. is a democracy. These people insist that we are a constitutional republic NOT a democracy. No matter that we ARE a representative democracy, which is also referred to as a republic. They deny reality & the dictionary. They are upaet because Karl Marx said that democracy is the road to socialism & socialist dictators–so we CAN’T be a democracy. It’s also convenient that one party is named after democracy and one after republic. The crazy just keeps getting crazier. In my almost 60 years, I never thought I’d see the day when people would try to deny that the U.S. is a democracy.

  • Peebs

    You’re right, Steven.President Obama: …and isn’t it a LOVELY morning?!Republicans: Up yours, n****r.

  • Alan Fors

    Yes Jan, and the Nazi’s were socialists because it was the National Socialist movement.

  • GrafZeppelin127

    Oh, they despise democracy. You can tell that they do because their latest buzzphrase is “tyranny of the majority.”Any discussion I’ve had with a right-winger recently, especially over at HuffPo, has led to this. I try to explain how democracy works, that the “government” is not a malevolent external force or arbitrary power-wielding but an expression and extension of the popular will (We the People and all that), that winning elections means you get to decide what policies to pursue and enact, etc., and I get this “tyranny of the majority” nonsense.I hate to use equivalencies to point such things out, but was it “tyranny of the majority” when George W. Bush took us to war despite the large and vocal protests against it? Was it “tyranny of the majority” when the GOP Congress impeached Bill Clinton despite poll after poll showing the public was overwhelmingly against it?”Tyranny of the majority,” in a country that is supposed to be a representative democracy, of, by and for the People, is just a fancy phrase for selfishness, solipsism, and sore loserdom.

  • http://broadwaycarl.blogspot.com Broadway Carl

    Boehner to Tea Party: “Oh boys? Look at what found here!”Obama: “Hey, where the white women at?”

  • MrBrink

    Steven Weber reminded me of something in this piece.The ideological contrasts.My heroes and inspirations could never be considered Conservative Republicans, with good reason.All my inspirations and world view table-setters are the sweet music makers, arm & arm civil rights warriors and sit-in peacemakers, authors, poets, thinkers, activists, and story tellers who lived it and wrote it all down– Mark Twain, Emily Dickinson, Longfellow, Maya Angelou, Carl Sagan, Ben Franklin, Hunter S. Thompson, Vonnegut, Howard Zinn, Chompsky, Gore Vidal…Elvis Dingeldein…on and fucking on and on and on…Who are the “Conservative Republican” heroes and inspirations?Ronald Reagan? John Wayne? Bill Buckley? Jerry Falwell? Oliver North? Ayn Rand? Alex P. Keaton..?The contrasts couldn’t be more clear to me.This context should see right wing conservatism laughed out of any conversations on topics of humanity in politics.But they still don’t get it.

  • Lexaburn

    Brink, you forgot Stephen Colbert, Archie Bunker, Gordon Gecko, Milton Friedman, Big Brother, Roscoe P. Coltrane, Snidely Whiplash, and George C. Scott performing as Patton.And last but not least, Martin Luther King who, as I’m sure the Cons will remind you without being prompted, was down with the GOPuppies.

  • MrBrink

    Good one(s), Lexaburn.I was actually hoping for a response like yours.You got-tha goods!

  • http://www.osborneink.com OsborneInk

    Funny, I was just working on a similar theme, and I think your exception that proves the rule is Joe Lieberman today. Why does Joe Lieberman hate the Constitution?I have quoted you.

  • MrBrink

    Good stuff, Osborne.

  • http://www.osborneink.com OsborneInk

    Actually, I gave the wrong link. Multitasking! Here’s where I quoted.

  • watchdog

    Jan Baxter @ #2Pretty much what I was going to say. these people will argue that we are really a Republic, and when you really think about it, their argument seems to come from the fact that they are REPUBLICans and the opposition is DEMOCRAts. It’s really that shallow