Burned

by

Okay, here’s a heavy-handed analogy, followed by a brief quiz:

So, some guys burn a house down.

Then they walk away.

Another guy comes along, sees the charred remains and wants to rebuild. He tries to gather materials but is thwarted by the friends of the guys who burned the house down.

Having little choice, he tries to get money to buy materials from those same guys.

They take the money, give him some materials to rebuild, but when he tries to use them, they knock the materials out of his hands. He bends down to pick them up and they knock them out of his hands again.

Sometimes they trip him.

Sometimes they make up scary stories about him.

They force him to give time and energy towards things that make no sense instead of toward rebuilding the house they burned.

And they never really let him get started with the rebuilding of the house they burned down.

Question: is the whole thing the new guy’s fault?

Answer: if you are a Republican, then yes.

It’s perverse, isn’t it? It’s an approach that echoes the arguably impotent “Just say no” anti-drug campaign that squeezed its way out from under a big Republican’s behind. It’s a way to say “Hey! I’m taking action!” when, really, you aren’t doing anything except making a loud noise.

In this case though, denying any culpability despite having committed the aforementioned fictional analogous act in broad daylight is the height of sociopathy.

That is, unless it’s a tactic. In which case it is a premeditated strategy based on studies of power and human behavior which probably rival similar studies as researched by academics connected to historically oppressive political movements enamored with such a manipulative and disingenuous endgame.

It’s weird that such insensitivities seem to regularly spring from the right wing’s well. After a while, you’d have to think that the welfare of American citizens isn’t something they’re really interested in at all.

And there’s other stuff, too.

Like allowing the fringe to swamp the middle and looking the other way as chaos replaces order. This is clearly delineated every single day in the deeds and words issued from the right wing (or the GOP and Fox News by extension. No, wait… the other way around. No, wait…)

Another broad analogy would be to say that they are basically committing a perpetual hit and run on America. They have decided that the old ways of playing by sets of rules that apply to all ideological persuasions are obsolete, that the purposeful alignment with forces which resist any regulatory mechanisms and that almost by definition will most certainly become juggernauts of instability may net the newly ruthless right wing sponsors a quick return.

Given what the world witnesses every day, that would seem to be a reasonably accurate description of Things Right Wing. For they have decided that there’s gold in them there hicks. And by obstructing almost all attempts to rebuild the country which was purposely effed-up by their own dastardly deceptions, by owning the means to disseminate their misdirected messages of mayhem, by owning all the tools which would facilitate a steady and necessary recovery, they retain the right to taunt, torture and otherwise ruin whoever comes along to fix it.

The problem is that such an approach will just as certainly burn the ground out from under them and all the unknowing, unseeing enablers that comprise their fringe infantry.

And when their own house burns, will there be anyone to help them rebuild?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • kansasdem

    Great article!One of my favorite analogies is based on the Grover Norquist quote, “I don’t want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.”Well, when Obama took office “Guvmt” was pretty well going down for the third and last time, and the GOP has effectively tied one of his hands behind his back, the Blue Dogs have greased the other hand, and every time Obama pulls “Guvmt’s” head above water these same obstructionists start screaming and kicking!The most mind boggling part of this scenario is the elderly supporters! What do they think will happen to Social Security and Medicare if the GOP has their way?Idiots.

  • http://www.politicalruminations.com/ Nicole473

    It may be “heavy-handed”, but it is the TRUTH .Excellent piece. Thank you.

  • wesley welbourne

    Great article as always. You need to write more frequently! Also, why was this not posted to huffingtonpost.com? Just curious.

  • Lexaburn

    It’s always good to witness someone else keeping up with Republicon chicanery, skullduggery, and sabotage.The party, as a whole, is responsible for the most egregious modern-day villainy in America, and a good measure of its constituents cheer the party on the way some of us genre film geeks (yeah myself included) may cheer on Michael Myers, Jason Voorhees, or Freddy Krueger.It’s all one big show to them, but you know how they’ll react to real adversity. As loud as they are when things are generally stable, they are always the first to overreact, search for excuses, and disavow their own responsibility regarding their predicament. Their routine is what will do them in, if anything.When their house burns down, they’ll have no one to blame but themselves. What some of them will do is search for scapegoats, meaning anyone that differs from their own point of view. It always has to be the fault of someone else. If no one else is around, they will blame each other, based on a potpourri of minutia. For instance, dummies like Michael Steele will immediately be singled out, because you know…We cannot negotiate with these people. They observe FNC with the fervor of a crowd of religious fanatics. The fact that we voice our knowledge of its dubious tendencies only makes them more loyal to their idol. They are creatures of habit, which is the only reason they support the Republicon Party. With FNC it is completely different. The propaganda network evangelizes their intellectual myopia and willful ignorance. No amount of truth-telling, fact-checking, or good old fashioned journalism (the real kind) can compete with such zealotry-feeding. FNC is their tabernacle.It just goes to show the mindset we are dealing with, fostered throughout my lifetime by a malicious con-servative triumvirate. The GOP through political alchemy has created a three-headed dragon based on particular military, socioeconomic, and religious factions. It is now running amok, and our corrupt Fourth Estate fiddles while it stomps, gobbles, and scorches everything in its path.Woe to America.At least someone else knows the score.Thanks for your contribution, Mr. Weber.

  • laddieluv

    Sad, but so true.And so well said, Steven.Sigh.The rethugs/wingnutz et al do NOT care about the welfare of the American people.Power corrupts. Especially the low information, mentally marginal “prone to being a” cult member types.I’m in a daily fight to stay positive. Fortunately, most days I win the battle. And intelligent, insightful people like you, Steven, (and most of Bob’s posters) help me do it.Many thanks.

  • Jim Oliver

    Why would they worry about their own house burning down? The leaders of the party have houses made of asbestos and superconductors. When someone tries to burn down their house, it doesn’t work, and when the house next to theirs catches fire, their house becomes cozy warm from the glow.For the leaders, chaos and instability are the preferred condition. That’s where the profit is. And there are no consequences, as their constituents cannot make the logical cause-effect leap due to years of absorbing cognitive dissonance.There is no down side to their actions, unless their opposition forces a down side. And even then they can play victim. They may be the perfect predators.

  • Christine Pota

    Wonderful, well written article. How refreshing to read something that actual challenges my brain to think.But here’s my question. What do we do about it? What action to help the guy trying to rebuild the house? We cannot continue to undermine his actions because we don’t think they’re progressive enough.What can we do?